Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949711›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Common and distinct neural substrates of sentence production and comprehension.

Sladjana Lukic, Cynthia K Thompson, Elena Barbieri, Brianne Chiappetta, Borna Bonakdarpour, Swathi Kiran, Brenda Rapp, Todd B Parrish, David Caplan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01927302 (The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01927302 nacompletednot on this map

The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery (CNLR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2013 to 2019Enrolled90ConditionsAphasia, Dysgraphia, Anomia, AgrammatismArmsTreatment Focusing on Naming Objects, Treatment Focusing on Improving Spelling Abilities, Treatment Focusing on Improving Sentence Processing, No Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Causal evidence for a coordinated temporal interplay within the language network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sladjana LukicCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, United States. Electronic address: sladjana.lukic@ucsf.edu.
Cynthia K ThompsonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Communication, Northwestern University, United States; Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, United States; Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, United States; Mesulam Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern University, United States.
Elena BarbieriDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Communication, Northwestern University, United States; Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, United States.
Brianne ChiappettaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Communication, Northwestern University, United States; Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, United States.
Borna BonakdarpourDepartment of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, United States; Mesulam Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern University, United States.
Swathi KiranCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, United States; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing, College of Health & Rehabilitation, Boston University, United States.
Brenda RappCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, United States; Department of Cognitive Science, Krieger School of Arts & Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States.
Todd B ParrishCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, United States; Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, United States.
David CaplanCenter for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery, Northwestern University, United States; Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, United States.

Funding

Neurobiology of Language Recovery in Aphasia: Natural History and Treatment-Ind*P50DC012283 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 2013 to 2017
$11.7M
Neurolinguistic Investigations of Aphasia and RecoveryR01DC001948 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 1992 to 2021
$7.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC012283NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging and lesion-symptom mapping investigations implicate a left frontal-temporal-parietal network for sentence processing. The majority of studies have focused on sentence comprehension, with fewer in the domain of sentence production, which have not fully elucidated overlapping and/or unique brain structures associated with the two domains, particularly for sentences with noncanonical word order. Using voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) we examined the relationship between lesions within the left hemisphere language network and both sentence comprehension and production of simple and complex syntactic structures in 76 participants with chronic stroke-induced aphasia. Results revealed shared regions across domains in the anterior and posterior superior temporal gyri (aSTG, pSTG), and the temporal pole (adjusted for verb production/comprehension). Additionally, comprehension was associated with lesions in the anterior and posterior middle temporal gyri (aMTG, pMTG), the MTG temporooccipital regions, SMG/AG, central and parietal operculum, and the insula. Subsequent VLSM analyses (production versus comprehension) revealed critical regions associated with each domain: anterior temporal lesions were associated with production; posterior temporo-parietal lesions were associated with comprehension, implicating important roles for regions within the ventral and dorsal stream processing routes, respectively. Processing of syntactically complex, noncanonical (adjusted for canonical), sentences was associated with damage to the pSTG across domains, with additional damage to the pMTG and IPL associated with impaired sentence comprehension, suggesting that the pSTG is crucial for computing noncanonical sentences across domains and that the pMTG, and IPL are necessary for re-analysis of thematic roles as required for resolution of long-distance dependencies. These findings converge with previous studies and extend our knowledge of the neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension to production, highlighting critical regions associated with both domains, and further address the mechanism engaged for syntactic computation, controlled for the contribution of verb processing.

Indexed as

AphasiaBrain MappingComprehensionFrontal LobeFunctional NeuroimagingHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobeTemporal LobeAphasiaSentence processingSyntaxVoxel-based lesion-symptom mapping

Identifiers

PMID32949711
PMCPMC10134242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.