Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949673›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2021

Effects of Appetitive and Aversive Motivational States on Wanting and Liking of Interpersonal Touch.

Claudia Massaccesi, Sebastian Korb, Nadine Skoluda, Urs M Nater, Giorgia Silani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Endocannabinoid contributions to the perception of socially relevant, affective touch in humans.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Opioid-blunted cortisol response to stress is associated with increased negative mood and wanting of social reward.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Positive Affect: Nature and brain bases of liking and wanting.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia MassaccesiFaculty of Psychology, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: claudia.massaccesi@univie.ac.at.
Sebastian KorbFaculty of Psychology, Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria; Faculty of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Nadine SkoludaFaculty of Psychology, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria.
Urs M NaterFaculty of Psychology, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria.
Giorgia SilaniFaculty of Psychology, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: giorgia.silani@univie.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1262EPA EP-C-15-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social rewards represent a strong driving force behind decisions and behaviors. Previous research suggests that the processing of a reward depends on the initial state of the individual. However, empirical research in humans on the influence of motivational states on reward processing is scant, especially for rewards of social nature. In the present study, we aimed at investigating how aversive and appetitive motivation affects the processing of social rewards, such as interpersonal touch. Participants (n = 102) were assigned to an appetitive (positive) or aversive (negative) motivational state condition (via modified versions of the Trier Social Stress Test) or to a control condition. After the state induction, their (a) self-reports of wanting and liking, (b) effort, and (c) hedonic facial reactions during anticipation and consumption of interpersonal touch, were measured. Participants in the aversive group showed higher subjective wanting of interpersonal touch, but no changes in subjective liking, compared to the control group. The aversive group also showed stronger positive hedonic facial reactions during reward anticipation, reflecting stronger anticipatory pleasure. No significant effects were found for the appetitive group. The results indicate that, after being exposed to an aversive experience, the motivation to obtain interpersonal touch, as well as the associated anticipatory pleasure, increase, without a corresponding change in liking during or after its consumption. The findings point to differential state-dependent effects on the processing of social rewards, possibly due to the action of different neurobiological systems regulating reward anticipation and consumption.

Indexed as

MotivationTouch PerceptionEmotionsHumansRewardTouchfEMGinterpersonal touchlikingmotivational statessocial rewardwanting

Identifiers

PMID32949673
PMCPMC7616299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.