Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949426›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2021

Acceptance of patients towards task-autonomous robotic cochlear implantation: An exploratory study.

Bernhard J Jank, Markus Haas, Dominik Riss, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernhard J JankDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1420-5034
Markus HaasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dominik RissDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolf-Dieter BaumgartnerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, task-autonomous image-guided robotic cochlear implantation has been successfully completed in patients. However, no data exist on patients' perspective of this new technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of patients towards task-autonomous robotic cochlear implantation (TARCI).

methodsWe prospectively surveyed 63 subjects (51 patients and 12 parents of infants) scheduled for manual cochlear implantation. We collected sociodemographic and clinico-pathological characteristics and their attitude towards TARCI for themselves or their child using a questionnaire. Differences between variables were analysed using one-way analysis of variance and Spearman's rho was used to test for correlation.

resultsSeventy-three percent of patients and 84% of parents expressed a high acceptance towards TARCI for themselves, or their child, respectively. Interestingly, patients with a negative attitude towards TARCI were significantly younger.

conclusionThe attitude of patients and parents likely does not represent a barrier towards application of this new technology.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresChildHumansInfantParentsSurveys and Questionnairescochlear implantationimage-guidedpatient acceptancetask-autonomous robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID32949426
PMCPMC7900970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.