Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949409›Full record

ArticleJournal of microscopy2021

Imaging adult C. elegans live using light-sheet microscopy.

J VAN Krugten, K-K H Taris, Erwin J G Peterman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Enhanced neuroimaging with a calcium sensor inJournal of biomedical optics · 2023
    Article
  4. Single-molecule imaging in the primary cilium.Methods in cell biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Non-Rodent Genetic Animal Models for Studying Tauopathy: Review ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. High-speed label-free confocal microscopy ofBiomedical optics express · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J VAN KrugtenLaserLaB and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8790-2573
K-K H TarisLaserLaB and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin J G PetermanLaserLaB and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Live observation of biological phenomena in the context of living organisms can provide important insights in the mechanisms of these phenomena. However, the spatially complex and dynamic physiology of multicellular organisms can be a challenging environment to make observations with fluorescence microscopy. Due to the illumination of out-of-focus planes, confocal and particularly widefield fluorescence microscopy suffer from low signal-to-background ratio (SBR), photo toxicity and bleaching of fluorescent probes. In light-sheet microscopy (LSM), solely the focal plane of the detection objective is illuminated, minimising out-of-focus fluorescence and photobleaching, thereby enhancing SBR, allowing for low laser intensities and longer acquisition periods. Here we present a straightforward light-sheet microscope with a 1.0-NA detection objective and a fast sample-positioning stage that allows for four degrees of freedom. By imaging the sensory cilia and nervous system of living young adult C. elegans, we demonstrate that the instrument is well suited for relatively fast, volumetric imaging of larger (hundreds of micrometres cubed) living samples. These experiments demonstrate that such an instrument provides a valuable addition to commonly used widefield and confocal fluorescence microscopes. LAY DESCRIPTION: In fluorescence microscopy, sharp images can only be obtained when the light obtained from the section of the image that is in focus is not overwhelmed by light emerging from elsewhere. In this paper, we present a light-sheet fluorescence microscope, based on the OpenSPIM initiative, with a magnification of 90× and a sensitive sample positioning stage that allows for fast controlled linear movement and rotation. In a light-sheet microscope (LSM), the sample is illuminated from the side, compared to the direction of detection, limiting illumination only to the part of the sample that is imaged in the focal plane (general resources: Wikipedia or MicroscopyU). This does not only limit background noise, but also reduces damage to the sample due to phototoxicity. This makes a LSM particularly suitable for imaging living samples at high resolution, in three dimensions, over long periods of time. Our instrument was specifically designed for imaging adult C. elegans nematodes. We show here how the instrument compares to a standard epifluorescence microscope, imaging neuronal structures in the animals. The instrument proved well suited for fast volumetric imaging of larger cellular structures such as C. elegans neuronal cell bodies. Our experiments show that the instrument provides a valuable addition to widefield and confocal fluorescence microscopes commonly used to image adult C. elegans.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansFluorescent DyesAnimalsLasersMicroscopy, FluorescencePhotobleachingFluorescent DyesBiophysicsC. elegansfluorescence microscopyIFTlight-sheet microscopy

Identifiers

PMID32949409
PMCPMC7891351
OpenAlexW3087281629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.