ArticlePsychometrika2020
Joint Bayesian Estimation of Voxel Activation and Inter-regional Connectivity in fMRI Experiments.
Article in Psychometrika, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bayesian Spatiotemporal Model for Joint Estimation of Brain Activation and Connectivity in fMRI Studies.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Increasing the Reliability of Functional Connectivity by Predicting Long-Scan Functional Connectivity based on Short-Scan Functional Connectivity: Model Exploration, Explanation, Validation, and Application.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- MULTI-OBJECT DATA INTEGRATION IN THE STUDY OF PRIMARY PROGRESSIVE APHASIA.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
- A canonical polyadic tensor basis for fast Bayesian estimation of multi-subject brain activation patterns.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Estimation of fMRI responses related to epileptic discharges using Bayesian hierarchical modeling.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Bayesian regression analysis of skewed tensor responses.Biometrics · 2023Article
- Spatial Bayesian GLM on the cortical surface produces reliable task activations in individuals and groups.NeuroImage · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain activation and connectivity analyses in task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments with multiple subjects are currently at the forefront of data-driven neuroscience. In such experiments, interest often lies in understanding activation of brain voxels due to external stimuli and strong association or connectivity between the measurements on a set of pre-specified groups of brain voxels, also known as regions of interest (ROI). This article proposes a joint Bayesian additive mixed modeling framework that simultaneously assesses brain activation and connectivity patterns from multiple subjects. In particular, fMRI measurements from each individual obtained in the form of a multi-dimensional array/tensor at each time are regressed on functions of the stimuli. We impose a low-rank parallel factorization decomposition on the tensor regression coefficients corresponding to the stimuli to achieve parsimony. Multiway stick-breaking shrinkage priors are employed to infer activation patterns and associated uncertainties in each voxel. Further, the model introduces region-specific random effects which are jointly modeled with a Bayesian Gaussian graphical prior to account for the connectivity among pairs of ROIs. Empirical investigations under various simulation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the method as a tool to simultaneously assess brain activation and connectivity. The method is then applied to a multi-subject fMRI dataset from a balloon-analog risk-taking experiment, showing the effectiveness of the model in providing interpretable joint inference on voxel-level activations and inter-regional connectivity associated with how the brain processes risk. The proposed method is also validated through simulation studies and comparisons to other methods used within the neuroscience community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32949345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.