Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949338›Full record

ArticleGenetica2020

Genome wide annotation and characterization of young, intact long terminal repeat retrotransposons (In-LTR-RTs) of seven legume species.

Pawan Kumar Jayaswal, Asheesh Shanker, Nagendra Kumar Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pawan Kumar JayaswalNational Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Asheesh ShankerBanasthali Vidyapith, Banasthali, Rajasthan, 228371, India.
Nagendra Kumar SinghNational Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, 110012, India. nksingh4@gmail.com.
National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · INBanasthali University · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research B. P. Pal ChairIndian Council of Agricultural Research National ProfessorIndian Council of Agricultural Research Network Project on Transgenic in Crops
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Availability of genome sequence of different legume species has provided an opportunity to characterize the abundance, distribution, and divergence of canonical intact long terminal retrotransposons (In-LTR-RT) superfamilies. Among seven legume species, Arachis ipaensis (Aip) showed the highest number of full-length canonical In-LTR-RTs (3325), followed by Glycine max (Gma, 2328), Vigna angularis (Van, 1625), Arachis durensis (Adu, 1348), Lotus japonicus (Lja, 1294), Medicago truncatula (Mtr, 788), and Circer arietinum (Car, 124). Divergence time analysis demonstrated that the amplification timeframe of LTR-RTs dramatically varied in different families. The average insertion time of Copia element varied from 0.51 (Van) to 1.37 million years ago (Mya) (Adu, and Aip), whereas that of Gypsy was between 0.22 (Mtr) and 1.82 Mya (Adu). Bayesian phylogenetic tree analysis suggested that the 1397 and 1917 reverse transcriptase (RT) domains of Copia and Gypsy families of the seven legume species were clustered into 7 and 14 major groups, respectively. The highest proportion (approximately 94.79-100%) of transposable element (TE)-associated genes assigned to pathways was mapped to metabolism-related pathways in all species. The results enabled the structural understanding of full-length In-LTR-RTs and will be valuable resource for the further study of the impact of TEs on gene structure and expression in legume species.

Indexed as

PhylogenyRetroelementsFabaceaeGenome, PlantMolecular Sequence AnnotationRetroelementsCopiaGypsyIntact LTRLong terminal repeatTransposable element

Identifiers

PMID32949338
OpenAlexW3087441646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.