ArticleFamilial cancer2021
Quantitative evaluation of MSI testing using NGS detects the imperceptible microsatellite changed caused by MSH6 deficiency.
Article in Familial cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an effective biomarker for diagnosing Lynch syndrome (LS) and predicting the responsiveness of cancer therapy. MSI testing is conventionally performed by capillary electrophoresis, and MSI status is judged by visual assessment of allele size change. Here, we attempted to develop a quantitative evaluation model of MSI using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Microsatellite markers were analyzed in tumor and non-tumor tissues of colorectal cancer patients by NGS after a single multiplex polymerase chain reaction amplification. The read counts corresponding to microsatellite loci lengths were calculated independently of mapping against a reference genome, and their distribution was digitized by weighted mean. Weighted mean differences between tumor and non-tumor samples with different MSI status were assessed, and cut-off values for each marker in the discovery cohort were determined. Each microsatellite maker was defined as unstable if the weighted mean difference was greater than the cut-off value. In the discovery cohort, the evaluation model demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 100% for all markers. In the validation cohort, MSI status determined by the new model was consistent with the outcome of the conventional method in 29/30 cases (97%). The single inconsistent case was classified as low-frequency MSI by the conventional method but considered MSI-high by NGS. Genetic testing for mismatch repair genes revealed a pathogenic variant in MSH6 in the discordant case. We successfully developed a quantitative evaluation method for determining MSI status using NGS. This is a robust and sensitive method and could improve LS diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.