Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949264›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2020

On sample preparation methods for fermented beverage VOCs profiling by GCxGC-TOFMS.

Penghan Zhang, Silvia Carlin, Cesare Lotti, Fulvio Mattivi, Urska Vrhovsek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Penghan ZhangMetabolomic Unit, Food Quality and Nutrition Department, Research and Innovation Center, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8445-9107
Silvia CarlinMetabolomic Unit, Food Quality and Nutrition Department, Research and Innovation Center, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0398-6947
Cesare LottiMetabolomic Unit, Food Quality and Nutrition Department, Research and Innovation Center, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Fulvio MattiviMetabolomic Unit, Food Quality and Nutrition Department, Research and Innovation Center, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4935-5876
Urska VrhovsekMetabolomic Unit, Food Quality and Nutrition Department, Research and Innovation Center, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, Italy. urska.vrhovsek@fmach.it.ORCID 0000-0002-7921-3249
Fondazione Edmund Mach · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAromas and tastes have crucial influences on the quality of fermented beverages. The determination of aromatic compounds requires global non-targeted profiling of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the beverages. However, experimental VOC profiling result depends on the chosen VOC collection method.

objectivesThis study aims to observe the impact of using different sample preparation techniques [dynamic headspace (DHS), vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction (VALLME), multiple stir bar sorptive extraction (mSBSE), solid phase extraction (SPE), and solid phase micro-extraction (SPME)] to figure out the most suitable sample preparation protocol for profiling the VOCs from fermented beverages.

methodsFive common sample preparation methods were studied with beer, cider, red wine, and white wine samples. After the sample preparation, collected VOCs were analyzed by two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time of flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOFMS).

resultsGCxGC oven parameters can be optimized with the Box-Behnken surface response model and response measure on peak dispersion. Due to the unavoidable column and detector saturation during metabolomic analysis, errors may happen during mass spectrum construction. Profiling results obtained with different sample preparation methods show considerable variance. Common findings occupy a small fraction of total annotated VOCs. For known fermentative aromas, best coverage can be reached by using SPME together with SPE for beer, and VALLME for wine and cider.

conclusionsGCxGC-TOFMS is a promising tool for non-targeted profiling on VOCs from fermented beverages. However, a proper data processing protocol is lacking for metabolomic analysis. Each sample preparation method has a specific profiling spectrum on VOC profiling. The coverage of the VOC metabolome can be improved by combining complementary methods.

Indexed as

FermentationFermented FoodsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryOdorantsSolid Phase MicroextractionSpecimen HandlingVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic CompoundsFermented beveragesSample preparation methodsTwo dimensional gas chromatography–mass spectrometryVOC profiling

Identifiers

PMID32949264
PMCPMC7502039
OpenAlexW3087286935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.