Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949258›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021

Meniscal scaffold for the treatment of partial meniscal defect-clinical and radiological outcomes in a two-year follow-up.

Umer Butt, Filip Vuletić, Gregor Stenhouse, Damir Hudetz, Neil Bradbury

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Biologic Augmentation of Isolated Meniscal Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Labral reconstruction with polyurethane implant.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Umer ButtAO Clinic (Institute of Trauma, Orthopaedics and Sports Injury), Nazimabad No.4, Karachi, Pakistan.
Filip VuletićDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital 'Sveti Duh', Zagreb, Croatia. philip.vuletic@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7662-5774
Gregor StenhouseRoyal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
Damir HudetzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital 'Sveti Duh', Zagreb, Croatia.
Neil BradburyRoyal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
Royal United Hospital · GBKlinička bolnica "Sveti Duh" · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of meniscal scaffolds is to fill the defect, allow regeneration of meniscal-like tissues, and to prevent long-term risk of cartilage wear and tear. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical results after two years and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results a year after implantation of a meniscal scaffold.

methodsFifteen patients were recruited into a prospective, single-arm, single-center study, and treated with meniscal scaffolds as a result of segmental meniscal defect due to previous partial meniscectomy. Patients were evaluated using functional knee scores used pre-operatively and 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The radiological outcome was assessed using MRI at 12 months by evaluating scaffold size, morphology, and intensity according to the Genovese grading system. Cartilage assessment was completed according to The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score.

resultsAll patients completed a follow-up of 24 months. A statistically significant increase in mean levels of all functional scores was present in all patients. On the MRI, all but one of the patients presented an incorporated meniscal implant. In most of the patients (73%), the meniscal implant was a Genovese type III. Type II and III signal intensities were present in all scaffolds when compared with the residual meniscal tissue. A stable cartilage (ICRS) status was observed in 80% of the patients compared with the pre-operative cartilage scores.

conclusionIn our case series of patients treated with the meniscal scaffold implant, we observed good clinical results at a two year follow-up. Furthermore, MRI findings suggest that meniscal scaffolds might have a beneficial effect on articular cartilage.

Indexed as

Tibial Meniscus InjuriesFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMenisci, TibialPolyurethanesProspective StudiesTissue ScaffoldsTreatment OutcomePolyurethanesIrreparable meniscal defectKneeMeniscusMRIScaffold

Identifiers

PMID32949258
OpenAlexW3087312165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.