Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949255›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2021

The BUSCOPAN study: a randomized-controlled non-inferiority trial of a continuous butylscopolamine infusion versus placebo in patients with a renal colic not responding to oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

S Weltings, K T Buddingh, D C van Diepen, R C M Pelger, H Putter, M Rad, B M A Schout, H Roshani

Open access · hybridAbstract readEquivalence TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S WeltingsHaga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands. saskiaweltings@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6587-2251
K T BuddinghHaga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4880-1192
D C van DiepenErasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1692-0832
R C M PelgerLUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6328-6462
H PutterLUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-1422
M RadHaga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
B M A SchoutAlrijne Health Group, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-8907
H RoshaniHaga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Haga Hospital · NLAlrijne Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate whether placebo is non-inferior to continuous infusion of butylscopolamine in patients with renal colic.

methodsWe conducted a placebo-controlled, multicenter, double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) including 128 patients with renal colic (confirmed by ultrasound or CT-scan). Patients were randomized to receive either continuous IV butylscopolamine 100 mg/24 h or placebo (saline). Primary outcome is the amount of opioid escape medication used, measured in doses administered. Secondary outcomes are pain measured on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), side effects, and time of drug administration. Non-inferiority was assessed using linear regression with robust standard errors, with non-inferiority limit set at 0.5 units of escape medication.

resultsMedian number of doses of escape medication was one in both groups. The number of extra doses in the placebo group compared with the butylscopolamine group was 0.05, with a 95% robust confidence interval (CI) of 0.38-0.47. Upper limit of the CI remained below the non-inferiority limit of 0.5 (p = 0.04). No differences in secondary endpoints were seen between the groups.

conclusionPlacebo is non-inferior to continuous IV butylscopolamine for pain relief in patients with renal colic. Based on this study and previous evidence, there is no role for continuous butylscopolamine IV in the treatment of renal colic. Trial NL7819.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalButylscopolammonium BromideDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsRenal ColicTreatment FailureAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalButylscopolammonium BromideMuscarinic AntagonistsButylscopolammonium bromideRenal colicUreteral calculiUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID32949255
PMCPMC8332573
OpenAlexW3087246151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.