Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949062›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2021

Current calcium fortification experiences: a review.

Cristina Palacios, G Justus Hofmeyr, Gabriela Cormick, Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal, Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas, Ana Pilar Betrán

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predictive Modeling of Riboflavin Production inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Effects of Catfish (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Cristina PalaciosDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, Stempel School of Public Health, Florida International University, Miami, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-9437-0376
G Justus HofmeyrEffective Care Research Unit, Eastern Cape Department of Health, Universities of the Witwatersrand and Fort Hare, East London, South Africa.
Gabriela CormickDepartment of Mother and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maria Nieves Garcia-CasalDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Juan Pablo Peña-RosasDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ana Pilar BetránWHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CHConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARFlorida International University · USWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low dietary calcium is very common in many populations, contributing to nutritional rickets/osteomalacia in children/adults and increasing the risk of several health problems. Calcium is a nutrient of concern as the recommended nutrient requirements are difficult to meet in the absence of dairy products. The provision of culturally acceptable calcium-fortified foods may improve calcium intake when it is a feasible and cost-effective strategy in a particular setting. This landscape review was conducted in 2019 and describes current calcium fortification efforts and lessons learned from these experiences. Worldwide, the United Kingdom is the only country where calcium fortification of wheat flour is mandatory. It is estimated that this fortified staple ingredient contributes to 13-14% of calcium intake of the British population. Other items voluntary fortified with calcium include maize flour, rice, and water. Current calcium fortification programs may lack qualified personnel/training, clear guidelines on implementation, regulation, monitoring/evaluation, and functional indicators. Also, the cost of calcium premix is high and the target groups may be hard to reach. There is a lack of rigorous evaluation, particularly in settings with multiple micronutrient programs implemented simultaneously, with low quality of the evidence. Further research is needed to assess the impact of calcium fortification programs.

Indexed as

Calcium, DietaryNutritional RequirementsCalciumCost-Benefit AnalysisFlourFood, FortifiedHumansOryzaTriticumUnited KingdomWaterZea maysCalciumCalcium, DietaryWatercalciumfortificationguidelinesmandatoryprogramvoluntary

Identifiers

PMID32949062
PMCPMC8246751
OpenAlexW3087200145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.