Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949008›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2020

Worldwide management of donors after neurological death: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of guidelines.

Anne Julie Frenette, David Williamson, Matthew-John Weiss, Bram Rochwerg, Ian Ball, Dave Brindamour, Karim Serri, Frederick D'Aragon, Maureen O Meade, Emmanuel Charbonney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the challenges: main contraindications in organ donation in ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Hemodynamic management in brain dead donors.World journal of transplantation · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Julie FrenetteDepartment of Pharmacy, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. anne.julie.frenette@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2954-5616
David WilliamsonDepartment of Pharmacy, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Matthew-John WeissPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine, CHU de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Ian BallDepartment of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Dave BrindamourDepartment of Pharmacy, Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Karim SerriFaculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Frederick D'AragonCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Maureen O MeadeDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Emmanuel CharbonneyFaculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CAImpact · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversité Laval · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to systematically identify and describe guidelines for the care of neurologically deceased donors and to evaluate their methodological quality, with the aim of informing and supporting the new Canadian guidelines for the management of organ donors. METHODOLOGY: Following a systematic search, we included any document endorsed by an organ donation organization, a professional society, or a government, that aims to direct the medical management of adult, neurologically deceased, multi-organ donors. We extracted recommendations pertaining to six domains: the autonomic storm, hemodynamic instability, hormone supplementation, ventilation, blood product transfusions, and general intensive care unit (ICU) care. Methodological quality of the guidelines was assessed by the validated AGREE-II tool. MAIN

findingsThis review includes 27 clinical practice guidelines representing 26 countries published between 1993 and 2019. Using the AGREE-II validated tool for the evaluation of guidelines' quality, documents generally scored well on their scope and clarity of presentation. Nevertheless, quality was limited in terms of the scientific rigor of guideline development. Recommendations varied substantially across the domains of managing the autonomic storm, subsequent management of hemodynamic instability, hormone therapy, mechanical ventilation, blood product transfusion, and general ICU care. We found consistent recommendations for low tidal volume ventilation subsequent to the publication of a landmark clinical trial.

conclusionHighly inconsistent recommendations for deceased donor care summarized in this review likely reflect the relatively slow emergence of high-quality clinical research in this field, as well as a late uptake of recent validated guideline methodology. Even in this context of few randomized-controlled trials, our group supported the need for new Canadian guidelines for the management of organ donors that follow rigorous recognized methodology and grading of the evidence.

trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42018084012); registered 25 February 2016.

Indexed as

Tissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdultCanadaHumansIntensive Care Unitsbrain deathclinical practice guidelinesorgan donationorgan donorsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32949008
OpenAlexW3087483407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.