Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948992›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2021

Associations between shared care and patient experiences among older cancer survivors.

Michael T Halpern, Julia Cohen, Lisa M Lines, Michelle A Mollica, Erin E Kent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Myths and Presumptions About Cancer Survivorship.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Survivorship Care of Older Adults With Cancer: Priority Areas for Clinical Practice, Training, Research, and Policy.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael T HalpernHealthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. michael.halpern@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-8514-6313
Julia CohenRTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Lisa M LinesRTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27709, USA.
Michelle A MollicaHealthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Erin E KentUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000166UNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500132U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer survivors have unique medical care needs. "Shared care," delivered by both oncologists and primary care providers (PCPs), may better address these needs. Little information is available on differences in outcomes among survivors receiving shared care versus oncologist-led or PCP-led care. This study compared experiences of care for survivors receiving shared care, oncologist-led, PCP-led, or other care patterns.

methodsWe used SEER-CAHPS data, including NCI's SEER registry data, Medicare claims, and Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey responses. Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries age ≥ 65 years in SEER-CAHPS with breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, renal, or prostate cancers or hematologic malignancies who responded to a Medicare CAHPS survey ≥ 18 months post-diagnosis were included. CAHPS measures included ratings of overall care, personal doctor, specialist physician, health plan, prescription drug plan, and five composite scores. Survivorship care patterns were identified using proportions of oncologist, PCP, and other physician encounters. Multivariable regressions examined associations between care patterns and CAHPS outcomes.

resultsAmong 10,132 survivors, 15% received shared care, 10% oncologist-led, 33% PCP-led, and 42% other. Compared with shared care, we found no significant differences in experiences of care except for getting needed drugs (lower scores for PCP-led and other care patterns). Sensitivity analyses using different patterns of care definitions similarly showed no associations between survivorship care pattern and experience of care.

conclusionsWithin the limitations of the study dataset, survivors age 65+ receiving shared care reported similar experiences of care to those receiving oncologist-led, PCP-led, and other patterns of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Shared care may not provide survivor-perceived benefits compared with other care patterns.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMedicareNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Patient Outcome AssessmentPatient SatisfactionUnited StatesClaims analysesOncologyPatient satisfactionPhysician practice patternsSEER programSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID32948992
PMCPMC8508880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.