Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948980›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2021

Fractures' associated mortality risk in orthogeriatric inpatients: a prospective 2-year survey.

Andreas Wiedl, Stefan Förch, Annabel Fenwick, Edgar Mayr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. One-year mortality and functional outcome of inpatients aged 85 and older with thoracolumbar vertebral fractures: differences between operative and conservative treatment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreas WiedlAbteilung für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany. andreas.wiedl@gmx.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-9068
Stefan FörchAbteilung für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Annabel FenwickAbteilung für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Edgar MayrAbteilung für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe most common osteoporotic fragility fractures are hip, vertebral and upper extremity fractures. An association with increased mortality is widely described with their occurrence. Fracture-specific associated death rates were determined in a 2-year follow-up for patients treated on an orthogeriatric ward. These were compared amongst each other, examined for changes with age and their impact on the relative mortality risk in relation to the corresponding population.

methodsWe assessed all patients that were treated in the course of a year on an orthogeriatric ward and suffered from the following injuries: hip (HF), vertebral (VF) and upper extremity fractures (UEF). In a 2-year follow-up it was possible to determine the month of death in the case of the patient's decease. Pairwise comparisons of the three fracture type death rates were performed through Cox-Regression. We stratified the fracture-dependent absolute mortality and age-specific mortality risk (ASMR) for age groups 71-80, 81-90 and 91-95.

resultsOverall, we assessed 240 patients with HF, 96 with VF and 127 with UEF over the span of a year. 1- and 2-year-mortality was: HF: 29.6% a.e. 42.9%, VF: 29.2% a.e. 36.5%, UEF: 20.5% a.e 34.6%. Pairwise comparisons of these mortality values revealed no significant differences. In association with HF and VF, we observed a significant increase of 2-year mortality for the oldest compared to the youngest patients (HF: 60.4% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.028) (VF 70% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.033). The analogue comparison for UEF revealed no relevant difference in age-dependent mortality (40.9% vs. 31.1%; p = 0.784). Common for all fracture types ASMR's were more elevated in the younger patients and decreased with higher age.

conclusionThe fracture-related mortality in the 2-year follow-up was comparable. We observed a reduction of relative mortality risk in the oldest patients. While a direct influence of fracture on mortality must be supposed, we support the thesis of the fracture rather being an indicator of higher susceptibility of timely death.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporotic FracturesHumansInpatientsProspective StudiesRiskHip fracturesMortalityOrthogeriatricsOsteoporotic fragility fracturesUpper extremity fracturesVertebral fractures

Identifiers

PMID32948980
PMCPMC7900053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.