Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948971›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2021

Psychometric properties of the 12-item Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12) Spanish version for people with knee osteoarthritis.

Gabriel Horta-Baas, Rodrigo Vargas-Mena, Erik Alejandre, Ingris Peláez-Ballestas, María Del Socorro Romero-Figueroa, Gloria Queipo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel Horta-BaasServicio de Reumatología, Hospital General Regional número 1, Delegación Yucatán, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Calle 41 número 439 x 34, Colonia Industrial, 97150., Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico. gabho@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-2137
Rodrigo Vargas-MenaServicio de Traumatologia y Ortopedia, Hospital General Regional número 1, Delegación Yucatán, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
Erik AlejandreServicio de Traumatologia y Ortopedia, Hospital General Regional número 1, Delegación Yucatán, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
Ingris Peláez-BallestasServicio de Reumatología, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Ciudad de México, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5188-7375
María Del Socorro Romero-FigueroaCentro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac México, Campus Norte Huixquilucan, Ciudad de México, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-2202
Gloria QueipoServicio de Genética, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Ciudad de México, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2012-361X
Mexican Social Security Institute · MXHospital General de México · MXUniversidad Anáhuac · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change of the 12-item Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Spanish version questionnaire. This study was based on a questionnaire validation design. A cross-sectional survey of 199 patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and ten healthy controls was studied to evaluate the validity and reliability of KOOS-12. One hundred and sixteen patients were assessed for test-retest reliability, and 38 patients were included for a responsiveness assessment. Structural validity was assessed by the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Item response theory-based methods were used to determine the performance of the items. Internal consistency reliability was appropriate for all scales (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85-0.94). The intra-class correlation coefficient of KOOS-12 scales ranged from 0.60 to 0.71. The CFA and generalized partial credit model showed that KOOS-12 scales presented a good overall model fit. No differential item functioning was found. Convergent validity was demonstrated by strong correlations (Spearman's rho ≥ 0.70) with KOOS, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form (IKDC), and Knee Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Known-groups validity showed that KOOS-12 well discriminated subgroups of patients (radiographic severity and nutritional status). Standardized response means for KOOS-12 scales were ≥ 0.75. Changes in KOOS-12 scales had a moderate to strong correlation (Pearson's r ≥ 0.40) with the changes in the KOOS, ICOAP, and IKDC scales. The KOOS-12 Spanish version is a valid, reliable, and responsiveness to change questionnaire to measure patients' opinions about their knee and associated problems in Mexican subjects with KOA. Key Points • KOOS-12 is a short self-reported measure that assesses patient's opinions about the difficulties they experience due to problems with their knee and also covers aspects of pain, functional limitations, and knee-related quality of life. • The Spanish version of KOOS-12 questionnaire is a valid instrument for measuring the patients' opinions about their knee and associated problems, and is both reliable and responsiveness to change.

Indexed as

Knee InjuriesOsteoarthritis, KneeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPain MeasurementPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesKnee painOsteoarthritisPain measurementPatient outcome assessmentPsychometricsQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID32948971
OpenAlexW3087719879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.