Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948899›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

The importance of timely treatment for quality of life and survival in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases.

Floris R van Tol, Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk, David Choi, Helena M Verkooijen, F Cumhur Oner, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Letter to the Editor concerning "The importance of timely treatment for quality of life and survival in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases" by van Tol FR, et al. [Eur Spine J (2020): DOI 10.1007/s00586-020-06,599-x].European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Floris R van TolDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500 (G05.228), 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4703-8885
Karijn P M SuijkerbuijkDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
David ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Helena M VerkooijenImaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
F Cumhur OnerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500 (G05.228), 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jorrit-Jan VerlaanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500 (G05.228), 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.j.verlaan@umcutrecht.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA major challenge in metastatic spinal disease is timely identification of patients. Left untreated, spinal metastases may lead to gross mechanical instability and/or neurological deficits, often requiring extensive invasive surgical treatment. The aim of this cohort study was to assess the correlation between delayed treatment of patients with spinal metastases and functional performance, quality of life and survival.

methodsAll patients surgically treated for metastatic spinal disease at a tertiary care facility were included for analysis. Patients who underwent elective surgery were considered as timely treated, whereas patients requiring emergency surgery were considered to be treated in a delayed fashion. EQ-5D scores, KPS scores and mortality rates were compared between the two groups.

resultsA total of 317 patients (215 timely treated, 102 delayed) had survivorship data available and 202 patients (147 timely treated, 55 delayed) had clinical data available. Multivariate analyses showed delayed treatment was associated with lower EQ-5D and KPS scores and higher mortality rates, independent of confounders such as baseline EQ-5D/KPS scores, neurological status, tumor prognosis and patient age.

conclusionsThe results from the present study show delayed treatment of patients with symptomatic spinal metastases has both direct and indirect adverse consequences for functional performance status, quality of life and survival. Optimization of referral pattern may accelerate the time to surgical treatment, potentially leading to better quality of life and survival.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSpinal NeoplasmsCohort StudiesElective Surgical ProceduresHumansPrognosisDelayQuality of lifeSpinal metastasesSurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.