Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948801›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2020

TNFR1, TNFR2, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and heparin binding protein in identifying sepsis and predicting outcome in an intensive care cohort.

Maria Bergquist, Line Samuelsson, Anders Larsson, Jonas Tydén, Joakim Johansson, Miklos Lipcsey

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. NAT10-mediated acCellular & molecular biology letters · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria BergquistDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Maria.bergquist@medsci.uu.se.
Line SamuelssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Östersund), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anders LarssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Chemistry, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jonas TydénDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Östersund), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Joakim JohanssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Östersund), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Miklos LipcseyHedenstierna Laboratory, CIRRUS, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Umeå University · SEUppsala University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date no biomarkers can aid diagnosing sepsis with adequate accuracy. We set out to assess the ability of Tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) 1 and 2, Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and Heparin binding protein (HBP) to discriminate sepsis from non-infected critically ill patients in a large ICU cohort, and to evaluate their value to predict mortality at 30 days. Adult patients admitted to the ICU with an arterial catheter were included. Clinical data and blood samples were prospectively recorded daily. Diagnoses were set retrospectively. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used. NGAL, TNFR1 and TNFR2 were higher in sepsis patients compared to other diagnoses, as well as in non-survivors compared to survivors. In addition, these biomarkers increased with increasing stages of acute kidney injury. TNFR1 and TNFR2 performed similarly to NGAL and CRP in identifying sepsis patients, but they performed better than CRP in predicting 30-day mortality in this ICU cohort. Thus, TNFR1 and TNFR2 may be particularly useful in identifying high risk sepsis patients and facilitate relevant health care actions in this group of sepsis patients.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAgedAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBiomarkersBlood ProteinsCritical CareCritical IllnessFemaleHospital MortalityHumansKidney Function TestsLipocalin-2MaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAZU1 protein, humanBiomarkersBlood ProteinsLCN2 protein, humanLipocalin-2Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type IReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type II

Identifiers

PMID32948801
PMCPMC7501293
OpenAlexW3087096824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.