ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
Computational generation of an annotated gigalibrary of synthesizable, composite peptidic macrocycles.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Machine Learning and Structural Modeling Identify Multitarget Therapeutic Candidates for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Robust Conformational Space Exploration of Cyclic Peptides by Combining Different MD Protocols and Force Fields.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Article
- Virtual Screening of Peptide Libraries: The Search for Peptide-Based Therapeutics Using Computational Tools.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Designing Cyclic-Constrained Peptides to Inhibit Human Phosphoglycerate Dehydrogenase.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptidomimetic macrocycles have the potential to regulate challenging therapeutic targets. Structures of this type having precise shapes and drug-like character are particularly coveted, but are relatively difficult to synthesize. Our laboratory has developed robust methods that integrate small-peptide units into designed scaffolds. These methods create macrocycles and embed condensed heterocycles to diversify outcomes and improve pharmacological properties. The hypothetical scope of the methodology is vast and far outpaces the capacity of our experimental format. We now describe a computational rendering of our methodology that creates an in silico three-dimensional library of composite peptidic macrocycles. Our open-source platform, CPMG (Composite Peptide Macrocycle Generator), has algorithmically generated a library of 2,020,794,198 macrocycles that can result from the multistep reaction sequences we have developed. Structures are generated based on predicted site reactivity and filtered on the basis of physical and three-dimensional properties to identify maximally diverse compounds for prioritization. For conformational analyses, we also introduce ConfBuster++, an RDKit port of the open-source software ConfBuster, which allows facile integration with CPMG and ready parallelization for better scalability. Our approach deeply probes ligand space accessible via our synthetic methodology and provides a resource for large-scale virtual screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.