Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948691›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Learning probabilistic neural representations with randomly connected circuits.

Ori Maoz, Gašper Tkačik, Mohamad Saleh Esteki, Roozbeh Kiani, Elad Schneidman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rational thoughts in neural codes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ori MaozDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Gašper TkačikInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg A-3400, Austria.
Mohamad Saleh EstekiCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003.
Roozbeh KianiCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003; roozbeh@nyu.edu elad.schneidman@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0003-0614-6791
Elad SchneidmanDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; roozbeh@nyu.edu elad.schneidman@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0001-8653-9848

Funding

CRCNS: Neural coding and computation in large ensembles in prefrontal cortexR01MH109180 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI KIANI, ROOZBEH · 2015 to 2018
$939k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain represents and reasons probabilistically about complex stimuli and motor actions using a noisy, spike-based neural code. A key building block for such neural computations, as well as the basis for supervised and unsupervised learning, is the ability to estimate the surprise or likelihood of incoming high-dimensional neural activity patterns. Despite progress in statistical modeling of neural responses and deep learning, current approaches either do not scale to large neural populations or cannot be implemented using biologically realistic mechanisms. Inspired by the sparse and random connectivity of real neuronal circuits, we present a model for neural codes that accurately estimates the likelihood of individual spiking patterns and has a straightforward, scalable, efficient, learnable, and realistic neural implementation. This model's performance on simultaneously recorded spiking activity of >100 neurons in the monkey visual and prefrontal cortices is comparable with or better than that of state-of-the-art models. Importantly, the model can be learned using a small number of samples and using a local learning rule that utilizes noise intrinsic to neural circuits. Slower, structural changes in random connectivity, consistent with rewiring and pruning processes, further improve the efficiency and sparseness of the resulting neural representations. Our results merge insights from neuroanatomy, machine learning, and theoretical neuroscience to suggest random sparse connectivity as a key design principle for neuronal computation.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAction PotentialsAlgorithmsBrainHumansMachine LearningModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeuronscortical computationlearning rulesneural circuitspopulation codessparse nonlinear random projections

Identifiers

PMID32948691
PMCPMC7547210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.