Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948675›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Dopaminergic Modulation of Human Intertemporal Choice: A Diffusion Model Analysis Using the D2-Receptor Antagonist Haloperidol.

Ben Wagner, Mareike Clos, Tobias Sommer, Jan Peters

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dopamine and Temporal Discounting: Revisiting Pharmacology and Individual Differences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Phenylketonuria as an Adherence Disease.Patient preference and adherence · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dopamine Alters the Effect of Brain Stimulation on Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ben WagnerDepartment of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne 50969, Germany ben.jonathan.wagner@uni-koeln.de jan.peters@uni-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5401-2512
Mareike ClosDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University-Medical-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1611-9474
Tobias SommerDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University-Medical-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Jan PetersDepartment of Psychology, Biological Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne 50969, Germany ben.jonathan.wagner@uni-koeln.de jan.peters@uni-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0195-5357
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neurotransmitter dopamine is implicated in diverse functions, including reward processing, reinforcement learning, and cognitive control. The tendency to discount future rewards over time has long been discussed in the context of potential dopaminergic modulation. Here we examined the effect of a single dose of the D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol (2 mg) on temporal discounting in healthy female and male human participants. Our approach extends previous pharmacological studies in two ways. First, we applied combined temporal discounting drift diffusion models to examine choice dynamics. Second, we examined dopaminergic modulation of reward magnitude effects on temporal discounting. Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation revealed that the data were best accounted for by a temporal discounting drift diffusion model with nonlinear trialwise drift rate scaling. This model showed good parameter recovery, and posterior predictive checks revealed that it accurately reproduced the relationship between decision conflict and response times in individual participants. We observed reduced temporal discounting and substantially faster nondecision times under haloperidol compared with placebo. Discounting was steeper for low versus high reward magnitudes, but this effect was largely unaffected by haloperidol. Results were corroborated by model-free analyses and modeling via more standard approaches. We previously reported elevated caudate activation under haloperidol in this sample of participants, supporting the idea that haloperidol elevated dopamine neurotransmission (e.g., by blocking inhibitory feedback via presynaptic D2 auto-receptors). The present results reveal that this is associated with an augmentation of both lower-level (nondecision time) and higher-level (temporal discounting) components of the decision process.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBayes TheoremChoice BehaviorComputer SimulationDecision MakingDelay DiscountingDopamineDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsFemaleHaloperidolHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermReaction TimeRewardDopamineDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsHaloperidolcomputational modelingdecision makingdopaminehaloperidolintertemporal choicepharmacology

Identifiers

PMID32948675
PMCPMC7548690
OpenAlexW3087279959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.