Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948576›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Community knowledge, perceptions and practices around COVID-19 in Sierra Leone: a nationwide, cross-sectional survey.

Paul Sengeh, Mohammad B Jalloh, Nance Webber, Ibrahim Ngobeh, Thomas Samba, Harold Thomas, Helena Nordenstedt, Maike Winters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploring People's Perception of COVID-19 Risk: A Case Study of Greater Jakarta, Indonesia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul SengehResearch and Evaluation, FOCUS1000, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Mohammad B JallohOffice of the Chief Executive Officer, FOCUS1000, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Nance WebberCommunications Programme, FOCUS1000, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Ibrahim NgobehResearch and Evaluation, FOCUS1000, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Thomas SambaSierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Western Area, Sierra Leone.
Harold ThomasSierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Western Area, Sierra Leone.
Helena NordenstedtDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maike WintersDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden maike.winters@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-0915-6506

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the public's knowledge, attitudes and practices about the novel coronavirus in Sierra Leone to inform an evidence-based communication strategy around COVID-19.

designNationwide, cross-sectional Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices survey.

setting56 randomly selected communities in all 14 districts in Sierra Leone.

participants1253 adults aged 18 years and older of which 52% were men.

main outcome measuresWe calculated proportions of core indicators (awareness, knowledge, risk perception, practices). A composite variable for knowledge (based on seven variables) was created, and categorised into low (0-2 correct), medium (3-4) and high (5-7). Predictors of knowledge were analysed with multilevel ordinal regression models. Associations between information sources, knowledge and two practices (washing hands with soap and avoiding crowds) were analysed using multilevel logistic regression models.

resultsWe found that 75% of the respondents felt at moderate or great risk of contracting coronavirus. A majority (70%) of women did not know you can survive COVID-19, compared with 61% of men. 60% of men and 54% of women had already taken action to avoid infection with the coronavirus, mostly washing hands with soap and water (87%). Radio (73%) was the most used source for COVID-19 information, followed by social media (39%). Having a medium or high level of knowledge was associated with higher odds of washing hands with soap (medium knowledge: adjusted OR (AOR) 2.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 4.4; high knowledge: AOR 4.6, 95% CI 2.1 to 10.2) and avoiding crowds (medium knowledge: AOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.6; high knowledge: AOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.3).

conclusionsThis study shows that in the context of COVID-19 in Sierra Leone, there is a strong association between knowledge and practices. Because the knowledge gap differs between genders, regions, educational levels and age, it is important that messages are specifically targeted to these core audiences.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePandemicsPneumonia, ViralAdultBetacoronavirusConsumer Health InformationCOVID-19FemaleHand DisinfectionHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRadioSARS-CoV-2epidemiologyinfection controlpublic health

Identifiers

PMID32948576
PMCPMC7500298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.