Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948546›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Bedside hyperspectral imaging for the evaluation of microcirculatory alterations in perioperative intensive care medicine: a study protocol for an observational clinical pilot study (HySpI-ICU).

Maximilian Dietrich, Sebastian Marx, Thomas Bruckner, Felix Nickel, Beat Peter Müller-Stich, Thilo Hackert, Markus A Weigand, Florian Uhle, Thorsten Brenner, Karsten Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Maximilian DietrichDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian MarxDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas BrucknerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix NickelDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Beat Peter Müller-StichDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Florian UhleDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thorsten BrennerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karsten SchmidtDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany karsten.schmidt@uk-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-9406
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNormalisation of macrocirculatory parameters during resuscitation therapy does not guarantee the restoration of microcirculatory perfusion in critical illness due to haemodynamic incoherence. Persistent microcirculatory abnormalities are associated with severity of organ dysfunction and mandate the development of bedside microcirculatory monitoring. A novel hyperspectral imaging (HSI) system can visualise changes in skin perfusion, oxygenation and water content at the bedside. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of HSI for bedside monitoring of skin microcirculation and the association of HSI parameters with organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis and major abdominal surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Three independent groups will be assessed and separately analysed within a clinical prospective observational study: (1) 25 patients with sepsis or septic shock (according to sepsis-3 criteria), (2) 25 patients undergoing pancreatic surgery and (3) 25 healthy controls. Patients with sepsis and patients undergoing pancreatic surgery will receive standard therapy according to local protocols derived from international guidelines. In addition, cardiac output of perioperative patients and patients with sepsis will be measured. Healthy controls undergo one standardised evaluation. The TIVITA Tissue System is a novel HSI system that uses the visible and near-infrared spectral light region to determine tissue microcirculatory parameters. HSI analysis (hand/knee) will be done in parallel to haemodynamic monitoring within defined intervals during a 72-hour observation period. HSI data will be correlated with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, global haemodynamics, inflammation and glycocalyx markers, surgical complications and 30-day outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (S-148/2019). Study results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and medical conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00017313; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Hyperspectral ImagingSepsisCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsMicrocirculationObservational Studies as TopicPilot Projectsadult anaesthesiaadult intensive & critical careanaestheticsintensive & critical care

Identifiers

PMID32948546
PMCPMC7500303
OpenAlexW3087757887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.