Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948217›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2020

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery vs Thoracotomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Greater Than 5 cm: Is VATS a feasible approach for large tumors?

Güntuğ Batihan, Kenan Can Ceylan, Ozan Usluer, Şeyda Örs Kaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Post-thoracotomy Pain Syndrome.Current pain and headache reports · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Güntuğ BatihanDr Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery, Medical Practice and Research Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Yenişehir, Gaziler Street 331, 35110, Izmir, Turkey. gbatihan@hotmail.com.
Kenan Can CeylanDr Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery, Medical Practice and Research Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Yenişehir, Gaziler Street 331, 35110, Izmir, Turkey.
Ozan UsluerDr Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery, Medical Practice and Research Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Yenişehir, Gaziler Street 331, 35110, Izmir, Turkey.
Şeyda Örs KayaDr Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Surgery, Medical Practice and Research Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Yenişehir, Gaziler Street 331, 35110, Izmir, Turkey.
Yenişehir Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVATS lobectomy is a recommended surgical approach for patients with early-stage lung cancer. However, it is still controversial in locally advance disease. This study was conducted to compare intraoperative and postoperative results of VATS and thoracotomy in patients with tumors greater than 5 cm.

methodsFrom January 2014 to December 2018, 849 patients underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer at our center. The inclusion criterion of this study was patients who underwent anatomic lung resection for lung cancer with tumors larger than 5 cm((≥ T3). The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (n = 24) and those who underwent thoracotomy (n = 36). Patient characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative results were evaluated by review of the hospital records.

resultsIn the VATS group, mean drainage time and postoperative length of hospital stay were significantly shorter than the thoracotomy group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that overall and recurrence-free survival was longer in the VATS group and this result was statistically significant.

conclusionsAccording to the results of this study, we emphasize that VATS is a feasible surgical procedure for tumors larger than 5 cm.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedThoracotomyTurkeyLarge tumorsLung cancerMadrid as a poster discussionThis study presented in european respiratory congress 2019ThoracotomyVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID32948217
PMCPMC7501690
OpenAlexW3087037713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.