Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948138›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Lower versus higher diagnostic criteria for the detection of gestational diabetes for reducing maternal and perinatal morbidity: study protocol for the GEMS randomised trial.

Caroline A Crowther, Lesley M E McCowan, Janet A Rowan, Richard Edlin, Christopher J D McKinlay, GEMS Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline A CrowtherLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Building 503, Level 2, 85 Park Road, Auckland Private Bag 92019, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand. c.crowther@auckland.ac.nz.
Lesley M E McCowanDepartment Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Janet A RowanDepartment of Obstetrics, National Women's Health, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richard EdlinSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Christopher J D McKinlayLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Building 503, Level 2, 85 Park Road, Auckland Private Bag 92019, 1142, Auckland, New Zealand.
GEMS Study Group
University of Auckland · NZAuckland City Hospital · NZ

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 14/104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has lifelong implications for the woman and her infant. Treatment reduces adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes although uncertainty remains about the optimal diagnostic criteria. The GEMS Trial aims to assess whether detection and treatment of women with GDM using the lower International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Groups diagnostic criteria compared with the higher criteria recommended in New Zealand reduces infant morbidity without increasing maternal morbidity.

methodsGEMS is a multicentre, randomised trial. Women with a singleton pregnancy at 24 to 34 weeks' gestation are eligible who give written informed consent. Women are randomly allocated to the Lower Criteria Group or the Higher Criteria Group. Women with a normal OGTT by their allocated criteria receive routine care (Higher criteria: fasting plasma glucose < 5.5 mmol/L, AND 2 hour < 9.0 mmol/L; Lower criteria: fasting plasma glucose < 5.1 mmol/L, AND 1 hour < 10.0 mmol/L, AND 2 hour < 8.5 mmol/l). Women with GDM on OGTT by their allocated criteria receive standard care for GDM (Higher criteria: fasting plasma glucose ≥ 5.5 mmol/L, OR 2 hour ≥ 9.0 mmol/L; Lower criteria: fasting plasma glucose ≥ 5.1 mmol/L, OR 1 hour ≥ 10.0 mmol/L, OR 2 hour ≥ 8.5 mmol/L). The primary outcome is large for gestational age (birth weight > 90th centile). Secondary outcomes for the infant include a composite of serious outcomes, gestational age, anthropometry, Apgar score < 4 at 5 minutes, lung disease, use of respiratory support, hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, infection, and encephalopathy; and for the woman, a composite of serious outcomes, preeclampsia, induction of labour, mode of birth, weight gain, postpartum haemorrhage and infectious morbidity. A study with 4,158 women will detect an absolute difference of 2.9% in the proportion of large for gestational age infants from 10.0% using the lower criteria to 12.9% with the higher criteria. DISCUSSION: The GEMS Trial will provide high-level evidence relevant for clinical practice. If use of the lower diagnostic criteria results in significantly fewer large for gestational age infants and/or improves maternal and perinatal outcomes these criteria should be recommended for diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number ACTRN12615000290594 . Date registered: 27th March 2015.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and GynecologicalFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMulticenter Studies as TopicPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicdiagnostic thresholdGestational diabetes mellituslarge for gestational agerandomised trial

Identifiers

PMID32948138
PMCPMC7501633
OpenAlexW3087030678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.