Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32948131›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2020

Pain management in patients with end-stage renal disease and calciphylaxis- a survey of clinical practices among physicians.

Rajkumar Chinnadurai, Smeeta Sinha, Aoife C Lowney, Mary Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Calciphylaxis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajkumar ChinnaduraiDepartment of Renal Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, M6 8HD, UK. rajkumar.chinnadurai@srft.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3973-6595
Smeeta SinhaDepartment of Renal Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.
Aoife C LowneyPalliative Medicine, Sir Michael Sobell House Hospice, Oxford, UK.
Mary MillerPalliative Medicine, Sir Michael Sobell House Hospice, Oxford, UK.
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBSobell House · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalciphylaxis is a rare condition usually seen in patients with end-stage renal disease. Pain is a hallmark of this condition and can be extremely difficult to control. Anecdotal data suggests that pain management in calciphylaxis is challenging with variable approaches across the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally. A knowledge and practice survey was conducted to establish current practice in the management of pain in patients with calciphylaxis, in the UK. Based on the results and clinical experience the authors suggest a clinical practice guideline.

methodsAn online questionnaire was circulated among physicians (renal and palliative care) involved in the management of pain in calciphylaxis. The questionnaire included a mix of open-ended questions and questions with drop down options.

resultsOne hundred and six clinicians responded to the survey of which 60 (57%) respondents were from palliative medicine; the remaining 46 (43%) were from renal medicine. 31 (30%) respondents across both specialties had not encountered any patients with a diagnosis of calciphylaxis (renal-2, palliative care-29). A referral to the palliative care team was undertaken by 18% of renal physicians, 32% referred to the pain team and 50% referred to both. Only 3% of the palliative medicine respondents indicated that they had received a referral from the renal team at the time of diagnosis. Opioids were the preferred initial drug of choice for the management of all types of pain. Paracetamol was universally selected as the preferred first-choice adjuvant agent for management of all types of pain. The importance of advance care planning was highlighted with 72% undertaking advanced care planning discussions often or most of the time.

conclusionThere was wide variation in the current practice of pain management in patients with calciphylaxis, with variation between renal specialists and palliative care specialists. Referral to specialists in pain management is not universal despite the severe nature of the pain experienced by patients with calciphylaxis. The data generated has facilitated the development of a clinical practice guideline to support complex pain management in a group of patients with multiple comorbidities.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'AcetaminophenAdvance Care PlanningAmitriptylineAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidBreakthrough PainCalciphylaxisGabapentinHumansKidney Failure, ChronicNephrologyPainPain ManagementPalliative MedicineAcetaminophenAmitriptylineAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidGabapentinPregabalinCalciphylaxisGuidelinesOpioidsPain managementPalliative careSurvey

Identifiers

PMID32948131
PMCPMC7501607
OpenAlexW3087032276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.