Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32947901›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

How Different Are the Molecular Mechanisms of Nodal and Distant Metastasis in Luminal A Breast Cancer?

Petr Lapcik, Anna Pospisilova, Lucia Janacova, Peter Grell, Pavel Fabian, Pavel Bouchal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Petr LapcikDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Anna PospisilovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Lucia JanacovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Peter GrellDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Pavel FabianDepartment of Oncological Pathology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic.
Pavel BouchalDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZ

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 17-05957SMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky NV19-08-00250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node status is one of the best prognostic factors in breast cancer, however, its association with distant metastasis is not straightforward. Here we compare molecular mechanisms of nodal and distant metastasis in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, with major focus on luminal A patients. We analyze a new cohort of 706 patients (MMCI_706) as well as an independent cohort of 836 primary tumors with full gene expression information (SUPERTAM_HGU133A). We evaluate the risk of distant metastasis, analyze targetable molecular mechanisms in Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and identify relevant inhibitors. Lymph node positivity is generally associated with NF-κB and Src pathways and is related to high risk (OR: 5.062 and 2.401 in MMCI_706 and SUPERTAM_HGU133A, respectively,

Indexed as

breast cancerdistant metastasisGSEAinhibitorlymph nodepathway

Identifiers

PMID32947901
PMCPMC7563588
OpenAlexW3085782707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.