Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32947845›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2020

Uncovering New Drug Properties in Target-Based Drug-Drug Similarity Networks.

Lucreţia Udrescu, Paul Bogdan, Aimée Chiş, Ioan Ovidiu Sîrbu, Alexandru Topîrceanu, Renata-Maria Văruţ, Mihai Udrescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Guiding Drug Repositioning for Cancers Based on Drug Similarity Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Topological network measures for drug repositioning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucreţia UdrescuDepartment I-Drug Analysis, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3084-6301
Paul BogdanMing Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3740 McClintock Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90089-2563, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2118-0816
Aimée ChişDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology-Biochemistry, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.
Ioan Ovidiu SîrbuDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology-Biochemistry, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1618-9656
Alexandru TopîrceanuDepartment of Computer and Information Technology, University Politehnica of Timişoara, 2 Vasile Pârvan Blvd., 300223 Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7244-0732
Renata-Maria VăruţPharmacy Department I, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2-4 Petru Rares Str., 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2845-8609
Mihai UdrescuTimişoara Institute of Complex Systems, 18 Vasile Lucaciu Str., 300044 Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7607-9240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in bioinformatics, systems biology, and machine learning, the accurate prediction of drug properties remains an open problem. Indeed, because the biological environment is a complex system, the traditional approach-based on knowledge about the chemical structures-can not fully explain the nature of interactions between drugs and biological targets. Consequently, in this paper, we propose an unsupervised machine learning approach that uses the information we know about drug-target interactions to infer drug properties. To this end, we define drug similarity based on drug-target interactions and build a weighted Drug-Drug Similarity Network according to the drug-drug similarity relationships. Using an energy-model network layout, we generate drug communities associated with specific, dominant drug properties. DrugBank confirms the properties of 59.52% of the drugs in these communities, and 26.98% are existing drug repositioning hints we reconstruct with our DDSN approach. The remaining 13.49% of the drugs seem not to match the dominant pharmacologic property; thus, we consider them potential drug repurposing hints. The resources required to test all these repurposing hints are considerable. Therefore we introduce a mechanism of prioritization based on the betweenness/degree node centrality. Using betweenness/degree as an indicator of drug repurposing potential, we select Azelaic acid and Meprobamate as a possible antineoplastic and antifungal, respectively. Finally, we use a test procedure based on molecular docking to analyze Azelaic acid and Meprobamate's repurposing.

Indexed as

drug–drug similarity networkdrug repurposingdrug–target interactionsmolecular dockingnetwork centralitynetwork clustering

Identifiers

PMID32947845
PMCPMC7557376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.