Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32947838›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Measuring Antibiotic Stewardship Programmes and Initiatives: An Umbrella Review in Primary Care Medicine and a Systematic Review of Dentistry.

Leanne Teoh, Alastair J Sloan, Michael J McCullough, Wendy Thompson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of Dental Antibiotic Stewardship Interventions.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Stewardship of Antibiotics Prescribing in Belgian Dental Practice: A National Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Antibiotics in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of the Evidence beyond the Myth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  9. Moving the needle on dental antibiotic overuse in Canada post COVID-19.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leanne TeohMelbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9138-813X
Alastair J SloanMelbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1791-0903
Michael J McCulloughMelbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.
Wendy ThompsonDivision of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-4087

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship 241616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic stewardship aims to tackle the global problem of drug-resistant infections by promoting the responsible use of antibiotics. Most antibiotics are prescribed in primary care and widespread overprescribing has been reported, including 80% in dentistry. This review aimed to identify outcomes measured in studies evaluating antibiotic stewardship across primary healthcare. An umbrella review was undertaken across medicine and a systematic review in dentistry. Systematic searches of Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Web of Science were undertaken. Two authors independently selected and quality assessed the included studies (using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for the umbrella review and Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs for the systematic review). Metrics used to evaluate antibiotic stewardship programmes and interventions were extracted and categorized. Comparisons between medical and dental settings were made. Searches identified 2355 medical and 2704 dental studies. After screening and quality assessment, ten and five studies, respectively, were included. Three outcomes were identified across both medical and dental studies: All focused on antibiotic usage. Four more outcomes were found only in medical studies: these measured patient outcomes, such as adverse effects. To evaluate antibiotic stewardship programmes and interventions across primary healthcare settings, measures of antibiotic use and patient outcomes are recommended.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipdentalhealthcaremedicaloutcome assessmentprimary care

Identifiers

PMID32947838
PMCPMC7558917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.