Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32947602›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2021

Parents' ratings of post-discharge healthcare for their children born very preterm and their suggestions for improvement: a European cohort study.

Anna-Veera Seppänen, Priscille Sauvegrain, Elizabeth S Draper, Liis Toome, Rym El Rafei, Stavros Petrou, Henrique Barros, Luc J I Zimmermann, Marina Cuttini, Jennifer Zeitlin and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.

Anna-Veera SeppänenUniversité de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA, 75004, Paris, France. anna-veera.seppanen@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-0639
Priscille SauvegrainUniversité de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA, 75004, Paris, France.
Elizabeth S DraperDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Liis ToomeTallinn Children's Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia.
Rym El RafeiUniversité de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA, 75004, Paris, France.
Stavros PetrouWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Henrique BarrosEPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Luc J I ZimmermannEuropean Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (EFCNI), Munich, Germany.
Marina CuttiniClinical Care and Management Innovation Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Jennifer ZeitlinUniversité de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, EPOPé, INSERM, INRA, 75004, Paris, France.
SHIPS Research Group
Inserm · FRPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Leicester · GBHvidovre Hospital · DKPhilipps University of Marburg · DETallinn Health Care College · EEUniversity of Warwick · GBGhent University Hospital · BEHôpital Jeanne de Flandre · FRi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PTIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITKarolinska Institutet · SEKU Leuven · BEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMarche Polytechnic University · ITNewcastle University · GBOspedale degli Infermi · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollow-up of very preterm infants is essential for reducing risks of health and developmental problems and relies on parental engagement. We investigated parents' perceptions of post-discharge healthcare for their children born very preterm in a European multi-country cohort study.

methodsData come from a 5-year follow-up of an area-based cohort of births <32 weeks' gestation in 19 regions from 11 European countries. Perinatal data were collected from medical records and 5-year data from parent-report questionnaires. Parents rated post-discharge care related to their children's preterm birth (poor/fair/good/excellent) and provided free-text suggestions for improvements. We analyzed sociodemographic and medical factors associated with poor/fair ratings, using inverse probability weights to adjust for attrition bias, and assessed free-text responses using thematic analysis.

resultsQuestionnaires were returned for 3635 children (53.8% response rate). Care was rated as poor/fair for 14.2% [from 6.1% (France) to 31.6% (Denmark)]; rates were higher when children had health or developmental problems (e.g. cerebral palsy (34.4%) or epilepsy (36.9%)). From 971 responses, 4 themes and 25 subthemes concerning care improvement were identified.

conclusionsParents' experiences provide guidance for improving very preterm children's post-discharge care; this is a priority for children with health and developmental problems as parental dissatisfaction was high. IMPACT: In a European population-based very preterm birth cohort, parents rated post-discharge healthcare as poor or fair for 14.2% of children, with a wide variation (6.1-31.6%) between countries. Dissatisfaction was reported in over one-third of cases when children had health or developmental difficulties, such as epilepsy or cerebral palsy. Parents' free-text suggestions for improving preterm-related post-discharge healthcare were similar across countries; these focused primarily on better communication with parents and better coordination of care. Parents' lived experiences are a valuable resource for understanding where care improvements are needed and should be included in future research.

Indexed as

ParentsCerebral PalsyChild, PreschoolEpilepsyEuropeFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesNeonatologyPatient DischargePatient SatisfactionRiskSociodemographic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32947602
OpenAlexW3087576555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.