Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32947506›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2021

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of hydroxychloroquine in treating COVID-19 patients.

Tzu-Han Yang, Chian-Ying Chou, Yi-Fan Yang, Chian-Shiu Chien, Aliaksandr A Yarmishyn, Tzu-Ying Yang, Cheng-Hsuan Liu, Kao-Jung Chang, Yi-Ping Yang, Yuh-Lih Chang

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Pregnant women with COVID-19.Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tzu-Han YangDepartment of Pharmacy, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chian-Ying ChouDepartment of Pharmacy, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yi-Fan YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chian-Shiu ChienDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Aliaksandr A YarmishynDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Tzu-Ying YangDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Cheng-Hsuan LiuDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Kao-Jung ChangDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yi-Ping YangDepartment of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yuh-Lih ChangDepartment of Pharmacy, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Taipei University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince COVID-19 outbreak, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been tested for effective therapies, and the relevant researches have shown controversial results.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis were conducted after a thorough search of relevant studies from databases. Trials that have evaluated HCQ for COVID-19 treatment were recruited for statistical analysis with fixed- and random-effect models.

resultsNine trials involving 4112 patients were included in present meta-analysis. It was seen that HCQ-azithromycin (HCQ-AZI) combination regimen increased the mortality rate in COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-3.36) patients; however, it also showed benefits associated with the viral clearance in patients (OR, 27.18; 95% CI, 1.29-574.32). HCQ-alone when used as a therapy in COVID-19 did not reveal significant changes in mortality rate, clinical progression, viral clearance, and cardiac QT prolongation. Subsequent subgroup analysis showed that HCQ treatment could decrease mortality rate and progression to severe illness in severely infected COVID-19 patients (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.13-0.58). A lower risk of mortality rate was also noted in the stratified group of >14 days follow-up period (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.13-0.58) compared to ≤14 days follow-up period group that conversely showed an increased mortality rate (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.41-3.10).

conclusionOur results indicated that HCQ-AZI combination treatment increased mortality rate in patients with COVID-19, but it also showed benefits associated with viral clearance in patients. HCQ-alone used for treatment has revealed benefits in decreasing the mortality rate among severely infected COVID-19 group and showed potential to be used for COVID-19 treatment in long-term follow-up period group. Accordingly, more rigorous, large-scale, and long follow-up period studies in patients with COVID-19 are needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2AzithromycinCOVID-19ElectrocardiographyHumansHydroxychloroquinePublication BiasRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAzithromycinHydroxychloroquine

Identifiers

PMID32947506
PMCPMC12966122
OpenAlexW3087492547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.