ArticleJournal of biomechanics2020
Prediction of upper airway dryness and optimal continuous positive airway pressure conditions.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous positive airway pressure is the most effective long-term treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea, which is a sleeping disorder characterized by pauses in breathing during sleep. It introduces pressurized atmospheric air into the respiratory system in order to maintain open airways without blockage. Some continuous positive airway pressure devices incorporate a convective heat transfer humidifier to overcome dryness. However, many side effects, including the unacceptable excess of water droplets in the air supply line, have been reported and improvements are essential for better patient's comfort and acceptance of the therapy. The excess of water droplets is attributed to the qualitative rather than the quantitative approach of determining the rise in temperature and humidity of the inspired air. Therefore, a human upper airway mathematical model is developed to predict the heat and water transfer variation between normal breathing and continuous positive airway pressure conditions and determine the optimal input temperature and relative humidity in the continuous positive airway pressure humidifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.