ReviewJournal of microbiological methods2020
Microbial biosensors for recreational and source waters.
Review in Journal of microbiological methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biosensors, Artificial Intelligence Biosensors, False Results and Novel Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Harnessing the power of biosensors for environmental monitoring of pesticides in water.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- The Use of Electroactive Halophilic Bacteria for Improvements and Advancements in Environmental High Saline Biosensing.Biosensors · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Biosensors are finding new places in science, and the growth of this technology will lead to dramatic improvements in the ability to detect microorganisms in recreational and source waters for the protection of public health. Much of the improvement in biosensors has followed developments in molecular biology processes and coupling these with advances in engineering. Progress in the fields of nano-engineering and materials science have opened many new avenues for biosensors. The adaptation of these diverse technological fields into sensors has been driven by the need to develop more rapid sensors that are highly accurate, sensitive and specific, and have other desirable properties, such as robust deployment capability, unattended operations, and remote data transfer. The primary challenges to the adoption of biosensors in recreational and source water applications are cost of ownership, particularly operations and maintenance costs, problems caused by false positive rates, and to a lesser extent false negative rates, legacy technologies, policies and practices which will change as biosensors improve to the point of replacing more traditional methods for detecting organisms in environmental samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.