Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32946743›Full record

ReviewMolecular cell2020

Integrating Old and New Paradigms of G1/S Control.

Seth M Rubin, Julien Sage, Jan M Skotheim

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 259 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CDC7 and APC/CNature communications · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seth M RubinDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. Electronic address: srubin@ucsc.edu.
Julien SageDepartments of Pediatrics and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jan M SkotheimDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

Investigating molecular and cellular mechanisms of SCLC development to identify novel therapeutic strategiesR35CA231997 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGE, JULIEN · 2019 to 2025
$6.2M
Determining how cell growth triggers cell divisionR35GM134858 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jan M Skotheim · 2020 to 2026
$4.1M
Molecular basis of tumor suppression by Cdk4/6 inhibitionR01CA228413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI RUBIN, SETH MICHAEL, SAGE, JULIEN · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Structural Mechanisms Controlling Cell-Cycle Gene ExpressionR01GM124148 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI RUBIN, SETH MICHAEL · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
Structural mechanisms of FoxM1 regulationR01GM127707 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI RUBIN, SETH MICHAEL · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228413NCI NIH HHS R35 CA231997NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124148NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127707NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cdk-Rb-E2F pathway integrates external and internal signals to control progression at the G1/S transition of the mammalian cell cycle. Alterations in this pathway are found in most human cancers, and specific cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk4/6 inhibitors are approved or in clinical trials for the treatment of diverse cancers. In the long-standing paradigm for G1/S control, Cdks inactivate the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) through phosphorylation, which releases E2F transcription factors to drive cell-cycle progression from G1 to S. However, recent observations in the laboratory and clinic challenge central tenets of the current paradigm and demonstrate that our understanding of the Rb pathway and G1/S control is still incomplete. Here, we integrate these new findings with the previous paradigm to synthesize a current molecular and cellular view of the mammalian G1/S transition. A more complete and accurate understanding of G1/S control will lead to improved therapeutic strategies targeting the cell cycle in cancer.

Indexed as

G1 PhaseS PhaseAnimalsCell ProliferationCyclin-Dependent KinasesHumansModels, BiologicalRetinoblastoma ProteinCyclin-Dependent KinasesRetinoblastoma Protein▪▪▪

Identifiers

PMID32946743
PMCPMC7582788
OpenAlexW3087573264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.