Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32946532›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Tablet-based adaptation and administration of the Castles and Coltheart Reading Test 2 for a large longitudinal study.

Clair Bennett, Meabh Cullinane, Shannon K Bennetts, Jasmine Love, Naomi J Hackworth, Fiona K Mensah, Sheena Reilly, Jan M Nicholson, Elizabeth M Westrupp

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Clair BennettJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9149-3220
Meabh CullinaneJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Shannon K BennettsJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jasmine LoveJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Naomi J HackworthJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Fiona K MensahMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Sheena ReillyMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Jan M NicholsonJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Elizabeth M WestruppJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tablet-adapted measures provide an efficient, accurate method of data collection for large-scale studies. The Castles and Coltheart Reading Test 2 (CC2) is a standardized paper-and-pencil measure of children's reading ability. In the current study, the CC2 was administered to 603 children aged 7-8 years via iPad using electronic data capture software. Results indicate the tablet-adapted measure could be reliably administered by non-clinical staff and showed quantitative equivalence, i.e., comparable score distributions, to CC2 normative data. Internal consistency was good for regular and non-word lists. Findings suggest that the tablet-adapted CC2 is a viable tool for large research studies.

Indexed as

ReadingChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychometricsReference StandardsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32946532
PMCPMC7500685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.