Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32946505›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

BioPETsurv: Methodology and open source software to evaluate biomarkers for prognostic enrichment of time-to-event clinical trials.

Si Cheng, Kathleen F Kerr, Heather Thiessen-Philbrook, Steven G Coca, Chirag R Parikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Si ChengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Kathleen F KerrDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6438-9583
Heather Thiessen-PhilbrookDivision of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2067-0514
Steven G CocaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
Chirag R ParikhDivision of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

Renal Physiology and Phenotyping CoreP30DK079310 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ARONSON, PETER S. · 2008 to 2022
$16.8M
Novel Biomarkers in Cardiac Surgery to Detect Acute Kidney InjuryR01HL085757 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PARIKH, CHIRAG R · 2007 to 2019
$10.3M
Progression of Acute Kidney Injury to Chronic Kidney DiseaseU01DK082185 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PARIKH, CHIRAG R · 2008 to 2017
$5.1M
Impact of Exercise on Kidney Function and Injury among Elders in the LIFE TrialR01DK115562 · NIDDK · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI COCA, STEVEN G, SHLIPAK, MICHAEL G · 2018 to 2020
$2.2M
Impact of early antiretroviral therapy on kidney disease outcomesR01DK112258 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WYATT, CHRISTINA M · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
Linking the Effects of 9/11 to Kidney DiseaseU01OH011326 · OH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MCLAUGHLIN, MARY A · 2017 to 2019
$1.5M
Leveraging Clinical Trials of Diabetic Kidney Disease to Advance BiomarkersU01DK106962 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COCA, STEVEN G, PARIKH, CHIRAG R · 2015 to 2019
$1.3M
Mentoring Program for Translational and Patient Oriented Research in AKIK24DK090203 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PARIKH, CHIRAG R · 2012 to 2016
$896k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085757NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK090203NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079310NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK112258NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115562NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK082185NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK106962NIOSH CDC HHS U01 OH011326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers can be used to enrich a clinical trial for patients at higher risk for an outcome, a strategy termed "prognostic enrichment." Methodology is needed to evaluate biomarkers for prognostic enrichment of trials with time-to-event endpoints such as survival. Key considerations when considering prognostic enrichment include: clinical trial sample size; the number of patients one must screen to enroll the trial; and total patient screening costs and total per-patient trial costs. The Biomarker Prognostic Enrichment Tool for Survival Outcomes (BioPETsurv) is a suite of methods for estimating these elements to evaluate a prognostic enrichment biomarker and/or plan a prognostically enriched clinical trial with a time-to-event primary endpoint. BioPETsurv allows investigators to analyze data on a candidate biomarker and potentially censored survival times. Alternatively, BioPETsurv can simulate data to match a particular clinical setting. BioPETsurv's data simulator enables investigators to explore the potential utility of a prognostic enrichment biomarker for their clinical setting. Results demonstrate that both modestly prognostic and strongly prognostic biomarkers can improve trial metrics such as reducing sample size or trial costs. In addition to the quantitative analysis provided by BioPETsurv, investigators should consider the generalizability of trial results and evaluate the ethics of trial eligibility criteria. BioPETsurv is freely available as a package for the R statistical computing platform, and as a webtool at www.prognosticenrichment.com/surv.

Indexed as

SoftwareArea Under CurveBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePatient SelectionPrognosisSample SizeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32946505
PMCPMC7500596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.