ArticlePloS one2020
A computer-aided method for identifying the presence of softwood growth ring boundaries.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a computer-aided method to quantify the obvious degree of growth ring boundaries of softwood species, based on data analysis with some image processing technologies. For this purpose, a 5× magnified cross-section color micro-image of softwood was cropped into 20 sub-images, and then every image was binarized as a gray image according to an automatic threshold value. After that, the number of black pixels in the gray image was counted row by row and the number of black pixels was binarized to 0 or 100. Finally, a transition band from earlywood to latewood on the sub-image was identified. If everything goes as planned, the growth ring boundaries of the sub-image would be distinct. Otherwise would be indistinct or absent. If more than 50% sub-images are distinct, with the majority voting method, the growth ring boundaries of softwood would be distinct, otherwise would be indistinct or absent. The proposed method has been visualized as a growth-ring-boundary detecting system based on the .NET Framework. A sample of 100 micro-images (see S1 Fig via https://github.com/senly2019/Lin-Qizhao/) of softwood cross-sections were selected for evaluation purposes. In short, this detecting system computes the obvious degree of growth ring boundaries of softwood species by image processing involving image importing, image cropping, image reading, image grayscale, image binarization, data analysis. The results showed that the method used avoided mistakes made by the manual comparison method of identifying the presence of growth ring boundaries, and it has a high accuracy of 98%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.