Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32946433›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Nonlinear stimulus representations in neural circuits with approximate excitatory-inhibitory balance.

Cody Baker, Vicky Zhu, Robert Rosenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cody BakerDepartment of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0829-4790
Vicky ZhuDepartment of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1238-5895
Robert RosenbaumDepartment of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2105-9282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balanced excitation and inhibition is widely observed in cortex. How does this balance shape neural computations and stimulus representations? This question is often studied using computational models of neuronal networks in a dynamically balanced state. But balanced network models predict a linear relationship between stimuli and population responses. So how do cortical circuits implement nonlinear representations and computations? We show that every balanced network architecture admits stimuli that break the balanced state and these breaks in balance push the network into a "semi-balanced state" characterized by excess inhibition to some neurons, but an absence of excess excitation. The semi-balanced state produces nonlinear stimulus representations and nonlinear computations, is unavoidable in networks driven by multiple stimuli, is consistent with cortical recordings, and has a direct mathematical relationship to artificial neural networks.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsAnimalsCerebral CortexComputational BiologyNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID32946433
PMCPMC7526938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.