Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32946372›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2020

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation to treat idiopathic central sleep apnea.

Shahrokh Javaheri, Scott McKane

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01816776 (A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01816776 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the remedē® System in Patients With Central Sleep Apnea

TypeinterventionalSponsorRespicardia, Inc.Ran2013 to 2017Enrolled151ConditionsSleep Apnea, Central, Sleep Disordered Breathing, Heart FailureArmsTreatment Group (transvenous stimulation of the phrenic nerve), Control Group (Optimal Medical Therapy)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Is idiopathic central sleep apnea a separate entity?Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shahrokh JavaheriDivision of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Bethesda North Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Scott McKaneRespicardia, Inc., Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Bethesda North Hospital · USCoskata (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesIdiopathic central sleep apnea (ICSA) is a rare disorder diagnosed when known causes of central sleep apnea are excluded. No established treatments exist for ICSA, and long-term studies are lacking. We assessed the long-term effectiveness and safety of transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with ICSA.

methodsIn the remedē System Pivotal Trial, 16/151 (11%) participants with central sleep apnea were diagnosed as having ICSA. Patients were implanted and followed through 18 months of active therapy. Polysomnograms obtained at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months were scored by a central laboratory. Sleep metrics and patient-reported quality of life outcomes were assessed.

resultsPatients experienced moderate-severe central sleep apnea. The baseline AHI, central apnea index, and arousal index were 40, 25, and 32 events/h of sleep, respectively. These metrics improved at 6, 12, and 18 months of therapy: the AHI decreased by 25, 25, and 23 events/h (P < .001 at each visit), the central apnea index by 22, 23, and 22 events/h (P < .001 at each visit), and the arousal index by 12 (P = .005), 11 (P = .035), and 13 events/h (P < .001). Quality of life instruments showed clinically meaningful improvements in daytime somnolence, fatigue, general and mental health, and social functioning. The only related serious adverse event was lead component failure in 1 patient.

conclusionsThis is the longest prospective study for the treatment of ICSA. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation significantly decreased sleep-disordered breathing metrics with consequent improvement in quality of life at 6 months, and all benefits were sustained through 18 months. CLINICAL

trial registrationRegistry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Respicardia, Inc. Pivotal Trial of the remedē System; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01816776; Identifier: NCT01816776.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyPhrenic NerveSleep Apnea, CentralAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomeidiopathic central sleep apneaquality of lifetransvenous phrenic nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32946372
PMCPMC7848930
OpenAlexW3087500892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.