Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32946044›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2020

Monitoring of high-yield and periodical processes in health care.

Nataliya Chukhrova, Arne Johannssen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nataliya ChukhrovaUniversity of Hamburg, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Arne JohannssenUniversity of Hamburg, 20146, Hamburg, Germany. arne.johannssen@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-3996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical control charts have found valuable applications in health care, having been largely adopted from operations research in manufacturing. However, the most common types are not best-suited to monitor high-yield processes (outcomes comprising true/false fractions, 'near-zero') and periodical processes (characterized by sequences of single populations of finite sizes), but rather to monitor variable vital signs levels and, to a lesser degree, service performance indicators. We discuss control charts that are most suitable for fraction non-conforming measurements. We focus particularly on high-yield and periodical processes, i.e. range in which out-of-control conditions are expected and should be identified. For these conditions, we discuss control charts based on the family of hypergeometric distributions, explaining and comparing their application to more traditional alternatives with two health care case studies. We demonstrate that hypergeometric-type control charts provide higher sensitivity in timely identification of changing rare event fractions and are well-suited for monitoring of periodical processes, while remaining more resistant to false alarms, versus their alternatives.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalQuality ControlHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareCCC-chartHealth care monitoringHigh-yield processMedical risk managementNever eventsPeriodical process

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.