Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32946017›Full record

ReviewPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2021

Dating Matters and the Future of Teen Dating Violence Prevention.

Katrina J Debnam, Jeff R Temple

Abstract readLetterReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Engagement with a Text Message Booster to Extend a School-Based Teen Dating Violence Prevention Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Trauma-Focused Screening Approach for Teen Dating Violence Prevention.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katrina J DebnamSchool of Nursing, School of Education & Human Development, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800782, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0782, USA. kjd2m@virginia.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1905-2049
Jeff R TempleDepartment of Ob/Gyn, Center for Violence Prevention, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX, 77555-0587, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increased focus and research on violence prevention, rates of teen dating violence (TDV) victimization have remained stable for the last two decades. In response to this major public health concern, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed and evaluated a multicomponent school-based program, Dating Matters, with the goal of reducing teen dating violence perpetration and victimization. This commentary discusses themes from the results of Dating Matters studies included in this special section of Prevention Science. We review the challenges in implementing multicomponent violence prevention programs across the social ecology as well as the promise of success in communities with elevated rates of TDV. Finally, we summarize the implications of these findings for violence prevention research and offer emerging areas where more research is needed.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorBullyingCrime VictimsIntimate Partner ViolenceAdolescentHumansViolenceAdolescentsDating abuseDating violencePrevention programsYouth violence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.