Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32945988›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2020

How Should We Approach Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Cancer Patients Ineligible for Standard Non-surgical Treatment?

Tomoya Yokota, Satoshi Hamauchi, Hiromichi Shirasu, Yusuke Onozawa, Hirofumi Ogawa, Tsuyoshi Onoe, Tetsuro Onitsuka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Application of radiomics and machine learning in head and neck cancers.International journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomoya YokotaDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan. t.yokota@scchr.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-7327-7949
Satoshi HamauchiDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiromichi ShirasuDivision of Medical Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yusuke OnozawaDivision of Medical Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hirofumi OgawaDivision of Radiation Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tsuyoshi OnoeDivision of Radiation Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tetsuro OnitsukaDivision of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shizuoka Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCisplatin has been established as one of the most important agents in multidisciplinary treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). However, since HNC patients are often elderly and typically have several comorbidities, a limited number of patients can tolerate high-dose cisplatin in real-world HNC populations. We will provide a review of therapeutic alternatives to high-dose cisplatin-based treatment in the setting of definitive and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or induction chemotherapy. RECENT

findingsClinical criteria for CDDP ineligibility have been discussed in HNC. When considering cisplatin-based chemotherapy as part of a non-surgical approach, precise evaluation of the patient's physical condition, nutritional status, and comorbidities is needed. Upfront surgery is an important option with high curability, if a de-intensified non-surgical approach is estimated to be unavoidable. Although no prospective data are available regarding alternatives to definitive cisplatin-based combination therapy for patients undergoing a non-surgical approach, cetuximab, carboplatin, or split-dose cisplatin-based regimens may be employed for cisplatin-ineligible patients in clinical practice. The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy may be a promising novel approach, and some trials are currently targeting the specific cohort of patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin. There are no standard treatments for patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin. A personalized treatment strategy should be proposed based on the individual benefit-to-risk ratio of each treatment option in patients ineligible for the standard of care. Prospective clinical trials for cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced HNC still need to be performed.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyInduction ChemotherapyAgedCarboplatinCetuximabCisplatinClinical Trials as TopicHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckCarboplatinCetuximabCisplatinImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsCDDP ineligibilityHead and neck cancerImmunotherapyLocally advanced diseaseMultidisciplinary approachNon-surgical and surgical approach

Identifiers

PMID32945988
OpenAlexW3087452687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.