ArticlePlant cell reports2021
A robust and practical CRISPR/crRNA screening system for soybean cultivar editing using LbCpf1 ribonucleoproteins.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of Efficient CRISPR-Cas9 PEG-Mediated DNA-Free Genome Editing Through Ribonucleoproteins Method in Hexaploid Sweetpotato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Challenges and Opportunities with CRISPR-Based Genome Editing in Legume Crops.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Advances in the use of morphogenic regulators and peptide regenerating factors for boosting plant transformation and genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 in soybean research: a measured leap toward genetic refinement.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Based genome editing in pulses: current approaches, challenges, and future prospects.Plant molecular biology · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas genome editing in soybean: challenges and new insights to overcome existing bottlenecks.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Review
- Current and Prospective Applications of CRISPR-Cas12a in Pluricellular Organisms.Molecular biotechnology · 2023Review
- CRISPR/LbCas12a-Mediated Genome Editing in Soybean.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Recalcitrance to transformation, a hindrance for genome editing of legumes.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Progress in Soybean Genetic Transformation Over the Last Decade.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- A DNA-Free Editing Platform for Genetic Screens in SoybeanFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- CRISPR innovations in plant breeding.Plant cell reports · 2021Article
- CRISPR ribonucleoprotein-mediated genetic engineering in plants.Plant communications · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
key messageCalli protoplasts isolated from three soybean cultivars are useful tools to evaluate guide RNAs for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based precise gene editing. A type V CRISPR effector, LbCpf1(Cas12a) from Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND 2006, has been used for precision editing of the plant genome. We report that callus-derived protoplasts from three soybeans, including Glycine Max var. Williams 82 and two Korean cultivars (Kwangan and Daewon) represent efficient systems for the screening of active crRNA for CRISPR/LbCpf1. CRISPR/LbCpf1 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) were delivered as complexes of purified endonucleases mixed with designed crRNA to simultaneously edit target genes of GlymaFAD2-1A and GlymaFAD2-1B transfected into three soybean protoplasts including genome-sequenced Williams 82 with cultivars, Kwangan and Daewon. Previously, we reported that nine crRNAs designed for LbCpf1 exhibited varying degrees of editing efficacy for two FAD2 genes. Among the nine crRNAs, the LbCpf1-crRNA3 complexes showed the highest efficiency in soybean cotyledon protoplasts. The new screening systems of callus protoplasts from three soybeans have been successfully used to transfect GFP-tagged markers and CRISPR/LbCpf1 RNPs. The callus protoplasts confirm that the LbCpf1-crRNA3 complex is an active crRNA for LbCpf1 to edit two FAD2 genes similar to cotyledon protoplasts. These results demonstrate that soybean callus protoplast-based CRISPR/crRNA selection is a new and practical tool to screen the efficacy of crRNAs and a prerequisite for progressive regeneration of the edited soybean.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.