Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32945771›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2020

The VOICES Typology of Curatorial Decisions in Narrative Collections of the Lived Experiences of Mental Health Service Use, Recovery, or Madness: Qualitative Study.

Caroline Yeo, Laurie Hare-Duke, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Simon Bradstreet, Felicity Callard, Ada Hui, Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley, Eleanor Longden, Tracy McDonough, Rose McGranahan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Caroline YeoSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3399-4729
Laurie Hare-DukeSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2145-4557
Stefan Rennick-EgglestoneSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4187-011X
Simon BradstreetInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0339-1882
Felicity CallardSchool of Geographical & Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5350-1963
Ada HuiSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-046X
Joy Llewellyn-BeardsleySchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-6358
Eleanor LongdenGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3046-9697
Tracy McDonoughDepartment of Psychology, Mount St. Joseph University, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4877-7604
Rose McGranahanUnit of Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-0868
Fiona NgSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8656-8830
Kristian PollockSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6836-8595
James RoeNational Institute for Health Research, ARC East Midlands, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9514-5629
Mike SladeSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7020-3434

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0615-20016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollections of lived experience narratives are increasingly used in health research and medical practice. However, there is limited research with respect to the decision-making processes involved in curating narrative collections and the work that curators do as they build and publish collections.

objectiveThis study aims to develop a typology of curatorial decisions involved in curating narrative collections presenting lived experiences of mental health service use, recovery, or madness and to document approaches selected by curators in relation to identified curatorial decisions.

methodsA preliminary typology was developed by synthesizing the results of a systematic review with insights gained through an iterative consultation with an experienced curator of multiple recovery narrative collections. The preliminary typology informed the topic guide for semistructured interviews with a maximum variation sample of 30 curators from 7 different countries. All participants had the experience of curating narrative collections of the lived experiences of mental health service use, recovery, or madness. A multidisciplinary team conducted thematic analysis through constant comparison.

resultsThe final typology identified 6 themes, collectively referred to as VOICES, which stands for values and motivations, organization, inclusion and exclusion, control and collaboration, ethics and legal, and safety and well-being. A total of 26 subthemes related to curation decisions were identified.

conclusionsThe VOICES typology identifies the key decisions to consider when curating narrative collections about the lived experiences of mental health service use, recovery, or madness. It might be used as a theoretical basis for a good practice resource to support curators in their efforts to balance the challenges and sometimes conflicting imperatives involved in collecting, organizing, and sharing narratives. Future research might seek to document the use of such a tool by curators and hence examine how best to use VOICES to support decision making.

Indexed as

decision makingmental health recoverypersonal narrative

Identifiers

PMID32945771
PMCPMC7532459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.