ArticleJournal of proteome research2020
Immunoglobulin G Glycoprofiles are Unaffected by Common Bottom-Up Sample Processing.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- GlYcoLISA: antigen-specific and subclass-specific IgG Fc glycosylation analysis based on an immunosorbent assay with an LC-MS readout.Nature protocols · 2024Review
- High-Throughput Glycomic Methods.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Serum and Plasma Immunoglobulin G Fc N-Glycosylation Is Stable during Storage.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- Bioinformatics in Immunoglobulin Glycosylation Analysis.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) glycosylation is a key post-translational modification in regulating IgG function. It is therefore a prominent target for biomarker discovery and a critical quality attribute of antibody-based biopharmaceuticals. A common approach for IgG glycosylation analysis is the measurement of tryptic glycopeptides. Glycosylation stability during sample processing is a key prerequisite for an accurate and robust analysis yet has hitherto hardly been studied. Especially, acid hydrolysis of sialic acids may be a source for instability. Therefore, we investigated acid denaturation, centrifugal vacuum concentration, and glycopeptide storage regarding changes in the IgG glycosylation profile. Intravenous IgG was analyzed employing imaginable deviations from a reference method and stress conditions. All glycosylation features -sialylation, galactosylation, bisection, and fucosylation-remained unchanged for most conditions. Only with prolonged exposure to acidic conditions at 37 °C, sialylation decreased significantly and subtle changes occurred for galactosylation. Consequently, provided that long or intense heating in acidic solutions is avoided, sample preparation for bottom-up glycoproteomics does not introduce conceivable biases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.