ArticleESC heart failure2020
Efficacy of early initiation of ivabradine treatment in patients with acute heart failure: rationale and design of SHIFT-AHF trial.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart Rate Reduction and the Prognosis of Heart Failure Focused on Ivabradine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Successful treatment with ivabradine in a β-blocker-refractory patient with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- The role of ivabradine in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: exploring of underlying argument.Inflammopharmacology · 2022Article
- Acute Heart Failure in an Almost-Centenarian Patient With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Treated With Ivabradine.Cureus · 2022Article
- The association between ivabradine and adverse cardiovascular events in acute decompensated HFrEF patients.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Comment on: Efficacy of early initiation of ivabradine treatment in patients with acute heart failure: Rationale and design of SHIFT-AHF trial.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Efficacy of early initiation of ivabradine treatment in patients with acute heart failure: rationale and design of SHIFT-AHF trial.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsElevated heart rate (HR) in heart failure (HF) is associated with worse outcomes, particularly in acute HF (AHF). HR reduction with ivabradine reduces cardiovascular events in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. The present trial aimed to test the hypothesis that the early HR reduction using ivabradine improves clinical outcomes in patients with AHF. METHODS AND
resultsSHIFT-AHF is a prospective, multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivabradine when adding to standard therapy in AHF patients (SHIFT-AHF). The trial will include 674 AHF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 45% and New York Heart Association functional classes III-IV. Participants were enrolled from March 2020 and will be followed up until December 2022. Patients are randomized to treatment with ivabradine or placebo (randomization 1:1). After allocation, the dose of ivabradine is titrated according to HR. Six months' follow-up and three control visits (7, 90, and 180 days after enrolment) are required for every participant. Assessment involves clinical examination, laboratory tests, echocardiography, electrocardiography, heart rhythm, cardiac function, and quality of life. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause mortality or re-admission due to worsening HF. Secondary endpoints include the assessments of cardiac remodelling, cardiac functional capacity, and quality of life.
conclusionsThe SHIFT-AHF trial will shed further light on the role of early HR reduction using ivabradine in patients with AHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.