Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944817›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Choroidal thickness in lamellar macular holes.

Magdalena Kal, Mateusz Winiarczyk, Stanisław Głuszek, Jerzy Mackiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multimodal imaging of photoreceptor and vascular changes in lamellar macular hole and epiretinal membrane-associated foveoschisis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Primary Lamellar Macular Holes: To Vit or Not to Vit.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Magdalena KalInstitute of Medical Sciences of Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
Mateusz WiniarczykDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Stanisław GłuszekCollegium Medicum of Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
Jerzy MackiewiczDepartment of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. jerzymackiewicz@umlub.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose(1) To assess the thickness of the central choroid (BM-CSI) in swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) examination of lamellar macular holes (LMHs). (2) To establish correlations between the thickness of the central choroid (BM-CSI) in the LHM and the parameters of best-corrected visual acuity and reading vision in patients with LMH.

methodsThis prospective case-control study assessed a group of 30 patients (30 eyes) with LMHs and a control group of 45 patients (90 eyes). The thickness of the central choroid (BM-CSI) was measured with an SS-OCT device. The average choroidal thickness in the fovea was defined as average thickness in the central area of 1000 μm in diameter, according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). The results were correlated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and reading vision.

resultsThe average choroidal thickness in the study group (SG) with LMH was 160.34 μm (SD = 77.1), whereas in the control group (CG), it was 225.11 μm (SD = 93.8). The difference of 64.77 μm was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The BCVA was within the range between 0.7 (logMAR) and 0.1 (logMAR), with an average of 0.36 (logMAR) (SD = 0.23). Reading vision was within the range between - 0.2 (logMAR) and 0.3 (logMAR), with an average of 0.27 (logMAR) (SD = 0.12). A significant correlation between BCVA and the choroid (BM-CSI) was found. The correlation coefficient is average (r = 0.44) and positive. With better BCVA, a significantly thicker choroid (BM-CSI) can be observed. No significant correlation between BM-CSI and reading vision was found. The correlation coefficient value is minor (r = - 0.289), whereas lower values of BM-CSI can be observed with worse reading vision.

conclusionWe suggest that the choroid may take part in the pathogenesis of LMH development. Its significant thinning may be responsible for the ischemic degenerative mechanism degenerating outer layers of retina, apart from tractional mechanism.

Indexed as

Retinal PerforationsCase-Control StudiesChoroidHumansProspective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityChoroidChoroidal thicknessLamellar macular holeOptical coherence tomographySwept-source OCT

Identifiers

PMID32944817
PMCPMC7904735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.