Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944802›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021

The vancomycin soaking technique: no differences in autograft re-rupture rate. A comparative study.

Daniel Pérez-Prieto, Simone Perelli, Ferran Corcoll, Gonzalo Rojas, Verónica Montiel, Juan Carlos Monllau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Allograft contamination during suture preparation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an ex vivo study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Pérez-PrietoDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Passeig Marítim, 25, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. dperezprieto@parcdesalutmar.cat.
Simone PerelliCatalan Institute for Traumatology and Sports Medicine (ICATME), Hospital Universitari Dexeus.-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Sabino Arana 5-19, 08028, Barcelona, Spain.
Ferran CorcollDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Passeig Marítim, 25, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Gonzalo RojasHospital Regional Talca, Universidad Católica de Maule, Talca, Chile.
Verónica MontielClínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Juan Carlos MonllauDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Passeig Marítim, 25, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCatholic University of the Maule · CLClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESInstitut Català de Traumatologia i Medicina de l'Esport · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe main aim of this study was to evaluate the re-rupture risk after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) using the vancomycin soaking technique and to compare it with the re-rupture risk in patients on whom this technique was not utilized. The secondary purpose was to compare the functional outcomes of those two subsets of patients operated on for ACL-R. The hypotheses are that the vancomycin soaking technique does not affect the re-rupture risk or the functional outcomes. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective historical cohort study was conducted. Two groups were compared in terms of the re-rupture rate (traumatic or atraumatic) and functional outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner, and Lysholm). Group 1 consisted of patients that received pre-operative IV antibiotics. In group 2, the patients received pre-operative IV antibiotics along with a graft that had been presoaked in a vancomycin solution. A minimum follow-up of five years was required.

resultsThere were 17 patients that suffered a re-rupture in group 1 (4.7%) and 15 in group 2 (3.9%) (n.s.). IKDC was 82.0 in group 1 and 83.9 in group 2 (p = 0.049); Tegner scored 4 in both groups (n.s.) and Lysholm was 90.3 in group 1 and 92.0 in group 2 (p = 0.015).

conclusionThe vancomycin soaking technique for ACL autografts is a safe procedure for the daily clinical practice, in terms of re-ruptures. Moreover, it does not impair functional outcomes after an ACL-R.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesVancomycinAutograftsCohort StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVancomycinACL infectionACL reconstructionInfection preventionOrthopaedic infectionVancomycin technique

Identifiers

PMID32944802
OpenAlexW3087485339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.