Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944785›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

The direction of postural threat alters balance control when standing at virtual elevation.

Tiphanie E Raffegeau, Bradley Fawver, William R Young, A Mark Williams, Keith R Lohse, Peter C Fino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tiphanie E RaffegeauDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 S 1850 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. tiphanie.raffegeau@utah.edu.
Bradley FawverDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 S 1850 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
William R YoungSchool of Sport and Health Science, The University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
A Mark WilliamsDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 S 1850 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Keith R LohseDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 S 1850 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Peter C FinoDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 S 1850 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Engineering Career Development Center in Movement and Rehabilitation SciencesK12HD073945 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DEWALD, JULIUS P, REINKENSMEYER, DAVID JAY · 2012 to 2021
$7.9M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health K12HD073945NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD073945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiogenic settings lead to reduced postural sway while standing, but anxiety-related balance may be influenced by the location of postural threat in the environment. We predicted that the direction of threat would elicit a parallel controlled manifold relative to the standing surface, and an orthogonal uncontrolled manifold during standing. Altogether, 14 healthy participants (8 women, mean age = 27.5 years, SD = 8.2) wore a virtual reality (VR) headset and stood on a matched real-world walkway (2 m × 40 cm × 2 cm) for 30 s at ground level and simulated heights (elevated 15 m) in two positions: (1) parallel to walkway, lateral threat; and (2) perpendicular to walkway, anteroposterior threat. Inertial sensors measured postural sway acceleration (e.g., 95% ellipse, root mean square (RMS) of acceleration), and a wrist-worn monitor measured heart rate coefficient of variation (HR CV). Fully factorial linear-mixed effect regressions (LMER) determined the effects of height and position. HR CV moderately increased from low to high height (p = 0.050, g = 0.397). The Height × Position interaction approached significance for sway area (95% ellipse; β = - 0.018, p = 0.062) and was significant for RMS (β = - 0.022, p = 0.007). Post-hoc analyses revealed that sagittal plane sway accelerations and RMS increased from low to high elevation in parallel standing, but were limited when facing the threat during perpendicular standing. Postural response to threat varies depending on the direction of threat, suggesting that the control strategies used during standing are sensitive to the direction of threat.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsPostural BalanceStanding PositionAdultAnxietyFearFemaleHumansMaleAnxietyFear of fallingHeart rateMotor controlSwayVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID32944785
PMCPMC8364805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.