ArticleExperimental brain research2020
The direction of postural threat alters balance control when standing at virtual elevation.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental quantification of balance using whole-body stability regions from postural sway exercises.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Efficacy and biomechanical effects of the powered lower-limbs exoskeletons Keeogo in adults with neuromuscular diseases.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Distributions of plantar loads are altered when walking in anxiety-inducing virtual settings but not under cognitive demand.PloS one · 2026Article
- Behavioural risk models explain locomotor and balance changes when walking at virtual heights.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Walking on the Edge: Brain Connectivity Changes in Response to Virtual Height Challenges.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Effects of age and arm movement condition on dynamic balance performance during virtual height exposure.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- The relationship between a simulated glaucoma impairment and postural threat on quiet stance.Virtual reality · 2025Article
- Walking (and talking) the plank: dual-task performance costs in a virtual balance-threatening environment.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- The effect of mobility-related anxiety on walking across the lifespan: a virtual reality simulation study.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Classification and Analysis of Human Body Movement Characteristics Associated with Acrophobia Induced by Virtual Reality Scenes of Heights.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Perspective on Using Virtual Reality to Incorporate the Affective Context of Everyday Falls Into Fall Prevention.JMIR aging · 2023Article
- Visual feedback-dependent modulation of arousal, postural control, and muscle stretch reflexes assessed in real and virtual environments.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Fear of heights shapes postural responses to vibration-induced balance perturbation at virtual height.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- The Effects of Virtual Height Exposure on Postural Control and Psychophysiological Stress Are Moderated by Individual Height Intolerance.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anxiogenic settings lead to reduced postural sway while standing, but anxiety-related balance may be influenced by the location of postural threat in the environment. We predicted that the direction of threat would elicit a parallel controlled manifold relative to the standing surface, and an orthogonal uncontrolled manifold during standing. Altogether, 14 healthy participants (8 women, mean age = 27.5 years, SD = 8.2) wore a virtual reality (VR) headset and stood on a matched real-world walkway (2 m × 40 cm × 2 cm) for 30 s at ground level and simulated heights (elevated 15 m) in two positions: (1) parallel to walkway, lateral threat; and (2) perpendicular to walkway, anteroposterior threat. Inertial sensors measured postural sway acceleration (e.g., 95% ellipse, root mean square (RMS) of acceleration), and a wrist-worn monitor measured heart rate coefficient of variation (HR CV). Fully factorial linear-mixed effect regressions (LMER) determined the effects of height and position. HR CV moderately increased from low to high height (p = 0.050, g = 0.397). The Height × Position interaction approached significance for sway area (95% ellipse; β = - 0.018, p = 0.062) and was significant for RMS (β = - 0.022, p = 0.007). Post-hoc analyses revealed that sagittal plane sway accelerations and RMS increased from low to high elevation in parallel standing, but were limited when facing the threat during perpendicular standing. Postural response to threat varies depending on the direction of threat, suggesting that the control strategies used during standing are sensitive to the direction of threat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.