Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32944784›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2020

Preoperative imaging of spinopelvic pathologies : State of the art.

H Almansour, M Innmann, M Akbar, F Springer, C Rehnitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H AlmansourDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Tübingen University Hospital, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. haidara.al-mansour@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
M InnmannCenter for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
M AkbarClinic for Spine Diseases and Therapies, Meoclinic, Berlin, Germany.
F SpringerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Tübingen University Hospital, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
C RehnitzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of musculoskeletal diagnostics and personalized medicine has undergone a revolutionary transformation due to a deeper understanding of skeletal biomechanics and due to technological advancements. Analogous to this transformation, our understanding of spinopelvic conditions has experienced a paradigm shift in terms of both static and dynamic changes in spinopelvic pathologies and enabled a more accurate delineation of the drivers of disability. The purpose of this review is to describe the standard and state of the art of preoperative diagnostic and planning methods for common spinopelvic pathologies and to discuss both the added clinical value and limitations. The rationale is to accelerate the accurate and timely diagnosis and as well as the efficient and safe preoperative workflow.

Indexed as

HumansPelvisPreoperative PeriodSpineHipMusculoskeletal radiologyOrthopedic surgeryPreoperative planningSpine

Identifiers

PMID32944784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.