ArticleHealth policy and planning2020
From research to international scale-up: stakeholder engagement essential in successful design, evaluation and implementation of paediatric HIV testing intervention.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-designing the 'LEAD' strategy: A theory-informed stakeholder-led behavioural intervention to improve mass drug administration compliance for lymphatic filariasis elimination in an urban block of Odisha, India.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- How power is conceptualized and operationalized in evidence-based intervention implementation: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
- Stakeholder engagement as a valuable tool to improve the relevance of research regarding framework development.npj veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- STI point-of care tests: a call for quality-assured evaluation, implementation, innovation, and investment in future technologies.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Improving the provision for gynaecological health care in Bangladesh using Essential Gynaecological Skills implementation package: a stakeholder-driven approach in public health facilities.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Stakeholder considerations on acceptability and implementation of a novel rapid test for acute HIV infection: A qualitative study in Indiana.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Strengthening policy engagement when scaling up interventions targeting non-communicable diseases: insights from a qualitative study across 20 countries.Health policy and planning · 2024Article
- Stakeholder-engaged development of a rapid test for detection of acute HIV infection.Research square · 2024Article
- Examining the implementation of facility-based integrated management of childhood illness and insecticide treated nets in Bangladesh: lessons learned through implementation research.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- "When they are all grown, I will tell them": Experience and perceptions of parental self-disclosure of HIV status to children in Nairobi, Kenya.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Tensions and Paradoxes of Scaling Up: A Critical Reflection on Physical Activity Promotion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Complexities and Context of Scaling Up: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Perspectives of Scaling Physical Activity and Nutrition Interventions in Australia.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Enhancing community engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research: Equipping learners to thrive in translational efforts.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stakeholder engagement between researchers, policymakers and practitioners is critical for the successful translation of research into policy and practice. The Counseling and Testing for Children at Home (CATCH) study evaluated a paediatric index case testing model, targeting the children of HIV-infected adults in care in Kenya. Researchers collaborated with stakeholders in the planning, execution and evaluation, and dissemination phases of CATCH. They included a community advisory board, the national HIV programme, County health departments, institutional ethics review bodies, a paediatric bioethics group, facility heads and frontline healthcare workers . Stakeholder analysis considered the power and interest of each stakeholder in the study. All stakeholders had some power to influence the success of the project in the different phases. However, support from institutions with higher hierarchical power increased acceptance of the study by stakeholders lower in the hierarchy. During the planning, execution and evaluation, and dissemination phases, the study benefitted from deliberate stakeholder engagement. Through engagement, changes were made in the approach to recruitment to ensure high external validity, placing recruitment optimally within existing clinic flow patterns. Choices in staffing home visits were made to include the appropriate cadre of staff. Adaptations were made to the consenting process that balanced the child's evolving autonomy and risks of HIV disclosure. Dissemination involved delivering site-specific results in each HIV clinic, local and international conferences and sharing of study tools, resulting in the study approach being scaled up nationally. The deliberate engagement of stakeholders early in intervention development optimized study validity and accelerated adoption of the CATCH approach in nationwide HIV testing campaigns by the Ministry of Health and inclusion of paediatric index-case testing in national HIV testing guidelines. Involving policymakers and frontline healthcare workers throughout the study cycle builds capacity in the implementing team for quick adoption and scale-up of the evidence-based practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.